BLCN VS HODL: Sectors and Top Holdings
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

BLCN VS HODL: Sectors and Top Holdings

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by offering investors diverse exposure across a range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: BLCN (Reality Shares Nasdaq NextGen Economy ETF) and HODL (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF). We'll analyze key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodology, and exposure.

BLCN VS HODL: Overview

BLCN and HODL represent ETFs with distinct investment strategies in the burgeoning technology sector. While BLCN focuses on companies involved in the development and utilization of blockchain technology, HODL targets firms that participate in data sharing and security. This divergence in investment focus results in varying risk and growth potential, which we'll delve into further in the subsequent sections.

BLCN VS HODL: Sectors and Top Holdings

The BLCN ETF is designed to capture the growth potential of blockchain technology and includes holdings in companies like MicroStrategy, Square, and NVIDIA. In contrast, HODL invests in firms engaged in the transformational sharing of data, with top holdings such as Datadog, Splunk, and Alteryx. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in selecting an ETF that aligns with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

BLCN overlap BLCN VS HODL: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsBLCN overlap BLCN VS HODL: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

BLCN VS HODL: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

BLCN exhibits a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the blockchain industry. HODL's investment strategy revolves around identifying companies at the forefront of data sharing technologies. The difference in capitalization and investment strategy between the two ETFs offers varying potential for returns and risks, which investors must carefully evaluate.

BLCN VS HODL: Tracking Methodology and Exposure

BLCN aims to provide investors with exposure to companies actively engaged in blockchain technology, enabling them to participate in the potential disruption across industries. On the other hand, HODL offers exposure to companies driving transformational data sharing solutions. BLCN achieves its tracking by holding shares in blockchain-related companies, while HODL tracks an index composed of firms contributing to the data sharing ecosystem. Understanding these distinct tracking methodologies and exposures is crucial for investors to make informed decisions.

Conclusion

BLCN and HODL are distinct ETFs that offer specialized approaches to investing in transformative technology sectors. For investors seeking to gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider provides comprehensive details on these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer investment advisory services.

Sources:

BLCN ETF issuer
BLCN ETF official page

BLCN quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started