CGW VS FIW: Sectors and Top Holdings
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investing, providing investors with diverse exposure to various sectors and industries. In this article, we embark on a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: CGW (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF) and FIW (First Trust Water ETF). We'll explore key aspects such as their tickers, full names, issuers, sector focus, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
CGW VS FIW: Overview
CGW and FIW are two ETFs that offer distinct ways to gain exposure to the global water industry. While CGW tracks an index of companies involved in water-related businesses, FIW provides exposure to U.S. companies focused on water infrastructure and technologies. This divergence in focus leads to different risk-return profiles, which we'll delve into further.
CGW VS FIW: Sectors and Top Holdings
The CGW ETF concentrates on companies engaged in water-related activities such as water utilities, infrastructure development, and equipment manufacturing. Its top holdings include essential players like American Water Works, Danaher Corporation, and Ecolab Inc. In contrast, FIW's holdings revolve around U.S. firms related to water infrastructure, with American States Water Company, Mueller Water Products, and Essential Utilities among its primary components. Understanding these sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment objectives with the ETF that suits them best.
CGW overlap CGW VS FIW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
CGW VS FIW: Capitalization and Strategy
CGW's capitalization and asset under management reflect its global focus, offering exposure to a broad spectrum of water-related businesses. FIW, with its emphasis on U.S. water infrastructure, presents a more targeted strategy. CGW's approach involves tracking the performance of companies involved in water-related businesses worldwide, while FIW concentrates on the domestic market. Investors must evaluate these differences in capitalization and strategy to make informed decisions based on their risk appetite and investment goals.
CGW VS FIW: Tracking and Exposure
CGW tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index, providing investors with a comprehensive view of the global water industry. On the other hand, FIW follows the ISE Clean Edge Water Index, focusing specifically on U.S. companies engaged in water-related activities. The tracking methodologies of these ETFs reflect their respective investment objectives, and investors should consider these distinctions when assessing their desired exposure.
Conclusion
CGW and FIW offer unique pathways for investors to gain exposure to the water industry, each catering to specific areas of the market. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial data, ETF Insider provides an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, it facilitates an in-depth exploration of these ETFs and other financial instruments.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services and should not be construed as financial advice.
Sources:
Invesco: CGW - Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF Overview
First Trust: FIW - First Trust Water ETF Overview
CGW ETF issuer
CGW ETF official page
FIW quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the FIW First Trust Water ETF, access our dedicated page now.