CNBS VS YOLO: Sectors and Top Holdings
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have significantly transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two popular ETFs: CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF). Throughout the article, we will delve into various critical aspects, including ticker symbols, full names, issuers, sector focus, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
CNBS VS YOLO: Overview
CNBS and YOLO are two ETFs that provide distinct strategies within the rapidly evolving cannabis industry. While CNBS offers exposure to companies involved in the cannabis and hemp ecosystem, YOLO focuses on companies that derive a significant portion of their revenue from the legal cannabis sector. The differing investment approaches result in varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we will dissect in the following sections.
CNBS VS YOLO: Sectors and Top Holdings
CNBS's primary sector focus includes cannabis cultivation, distribution, and ancillary services. Its top holdings consist of companies like GW Pharmaceuticals, Aurora Cannabis, and Cronos Group. On the other hand, YOLO invests in various segments of the cannabis industry, including pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and cultivation. Top holdings for YOLO include Innovative Industrial Properties, Canopy Growth, and Aphria. A clear understanding of the sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment goals with the appropriate ETF.
CNBS overlap CNBS VS YOLO: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
CNBS VS YOLO: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
CNBS boasts a significant asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors interested in the cannabis industry. YOLO's strategy centers around capturing the performance of a diversified group of cannabis-related companies. The disparity in capitalization and investment approach between these ETFs introduces varying levels of risk and potential reward, prompting investors to carefully evaluate their investment objectives.
CNBS VS YOLO: Tracking and Exposure
CNBS tracks an index that includes companies operating across the cannabis supply chain, while YOLO provides exposure to both domestic and international companies engaged in the cannabis sector. CNBS's approach involves investing in companies contributing to the legal cannabis market's growth, whereas YOLO targets companies with substantial revenue from cannabis-related activities. The differences in tracking and exposure mechanisms offer investors the opportunity to choose the ETF that aligns with their preferences and risk appetite.
Conclusion
CNBS and YOLO offer distinct investment avenues for those seeking exposure to the burgeoning cannabis industry. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial information, investors can turn to ETF insider—an invaluable tool for exploring various financial instruments. With its user-friendly app, ETF insider empowers investors with comprehensive details, aiding them in making informed investment decisions.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.
Sources:
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) Prospectus
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) Prospectus
CNBS ETF issuer
CNBS ETF official page
YOLO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF, access our dedicated page now.