Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have rapidly gained popularity as a versatile investment tool that provides exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will undertake a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: CROP (Agribusiness ETF) and SOIL (Global Agriculture Index Fund). Our analysis will cover key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
The CROP and SOIL ETFs represent distinct approaches to investing in the agribusiness and agriculture sectors. While CROP focuses on companies engaged in agribusiness activities, SOIL tracks an index of global agriculture-related companies. This divergence in investment objectives results in varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we'll explore in greater detail in the following sections.
CROP primarily targets agribusiness companies involved in agriculture equipment manufacturing, fertilizer production, and crop protection. Its top holdings might include companies like Deere & Company, Nutrien Ltd., and Mosaic Company. On the other hand, SOIL's holdings encompass a broader spectrum of global agriculture-related firms, ranging from agricultural equipment manufacturers to food producers. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors seeking alignment with their investment preferences.
CROP overlap CROP VS SOIL
CROP and SOIL exhibit differences in terms of asset under management (AUM) due to their distinct focuses. CROP's investment strategy involves targeting companies that benefit from the broader agribusiness value chain, catering to the needs of a growing global population. SOIL's strategy revolves around tracking the performance of agriculture-related companies worldwide. Investors should weigh these strategies against their investment goals and risk tolerance to make informed decisions.
CROP's tracking method involves replicating the performance of an underlying agribusiness index, providing investors with exposure to various segments of the agribusiness sector. SOIL, on the other hand, seeks to replicate the performance of a global agriculture index, encompassing a broader range of companies involved in agriculture and food production. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure offered by each ETF is essential for investors looking to align their portfolios with specific industries.
CROP and SOIL are distinctive ETFs that cater to investors with varying preferences within the agribusiness and agriculture sectors. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, ETF Insider presents itself as a powerful tool. This user-friendly app empowers investors by providing comprehensive details about these ETFs and other financial instruments.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.
Sources:
Get startedCROP may be considered better than SOIL for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
SOIL's performance relative to CROP will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between CROP and SOIL should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both CROP and SOIL can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between CROP and SOIL can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.