DES VS PFM
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

DES VS PFM

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure to a wide array of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis of two prominent ETFs: DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF). We'll explore essential facets such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

DES Vs PFM: Overview

DES and PFM are two ETFs that approach the market with different investment strategies within the realm of dividend-focused investing. DES aims to track the performance of small-cap dividend-paying companies, while PFM follows an index of companies with a history of increasing dividends. The differing approaches to dividends make these ETFs suitable for distinct investor preferences and goals.

DES Vs PFM: Sectors and Top Holdings

The DES ETF primarily focuses on small-cap dividend-paying companies across various sectors, providing exposure to sectors like financials, industrials, and consumer discretionary. PFM, on the other hand, offers a more diversified exposure across large-cap dividend achievers, encompassing sectors such as information technology, healthcare, and consumer staples. Exploring the sectors and top holdings aids investors in determining which ETF aligns better with their investment strategies and risk appetite.

DES  overlap DES VS PFMDES overlap DES VS PFM

DES Vs PFM: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

DES and PFM differ in terms of capitalization and investment strategy. DES focuses on small-cap companies, which tend to have higher growth potential but may also carry higher risk. PFM, with its large-cap focus, offers more stability and established dividend histories. While DES seeks to capture dividend income and potential growth, PFM's strategy revolves around stable and growing dividend payments from established companies. Investors should evaluate their risk tolerance and investment objectives when choosing between these two ETFs.

DES Vs PFM: Tracking Methods and Exposure

The tracking methods of DES and PFM diverge due to their distinct investment approaches. DES tracks an index of small-cap dividend-paying stocks, whereas PFM follows an index of companies with consistent dividend growth. This variance in tracking results in different exposure profiles for the two ETFs. Investors interested in dividend income can explore DES, while those seeking established dividend growth may lean towards PFM.

Conclusion

DES and PFM are prominent ETFs catering to investors seeking dividend-focused strategies. The selection between these two ETFs hinges on factors such as risk tolerance, investment goals, and sector preferences. For investors seeking detailed insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical aspects of these ETFs, ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider empowers investors with comprehensive information on these financial instruments and beyond.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) Fact Sheet
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) Overview
Investopedia - Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) Definition

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is DES better than PFM?

    DES may be considered better than PFM for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does PFM beat DES?

    PFM's performance relative to DES will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in DES or PFM?

    The choice between DES and PFM should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are DES and PFM good investments?

    Both DES and PFM can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between DES and PFM?

    The correlation between DES and PFM can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.