DES VS SDIV
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

DES VS SDIV

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become an essential tool for modern investors, offering an efficient and diversified way to access various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF). Through a thorough analysis, we will explore their ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

DES Vs SDIV: Overview

DES and SDIV represent distinct investment strategies within the realm of dividend-focused ETFs. While both funds aim to provide dividend income, they have different approaches. DES focuses on U.S. small-cap dividend-paying stocks, whereas SDIV has a global scope and includes a broader range of high-dividend-yield equities. This fundamental difference influences their performance and risk characteristics, which we will delve into further.

DES Vs SDIV: Sectors and Top Holdings

The DES ETF primarily invests in dividend-paying small-cap stocks across various sectors in the U.S. market. It includes companies from sectors such as financials, industrials, and consumer discretionary. On the other hand, SDIV holds a more diverse portfolio with global exposure, encompassing sectors like real estate, energy, and utilities. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for assessing their potential alignment with an investor's income goals and risk preferences.

DES  overlap DES VS SDIVDES overlap DES VS SDIV

DES Vs SDIV: Capitalization and Strategy

DES and SDIV differ not only in their investment universes but also in terms of capitalization and strategy. DES focuses on smaller companies, as reflected in its small-cap emphasis. SDIV, however, encompasses companies of various sizes and geographic locations. The strategy behind DES involves capturing dividends from smaller U.S. firms, whereas SDIV seeks dividends from a broader spectrum of global equities. Investors should consider the trade-offs between potential returns and risks based on these differing strategies.

DES Vs SDIV: Tracking and Exposure

DES and SDIV have distinct tracking and exposure methodologies. DES tracks an index that is designed to measure the performance of U.S. small-cap dividend-paying stocks. SDIV, on the other hand, tracks an index composed of 100 global companies with high dividend yields. This divergence in tracking methods underscores the importance of understanding the specific index each ETF follows and its implications for the fund's performance and risk profile.

Conclusion

In the world of ETF investing, choices abound, and each ETF has its unique value proposition. DES and SDIV cater to investors seeking dividend income, but their strategies, scopes, and risk profiles differ significantly. For those looking to gain deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, and overlaps, as well as to assess other financial instruments, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors with valuable information and helps them make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.
Sources:

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is DES better than SDIV?

    DES may be considered better than SDIV for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does SDIV beat DES?

    SDIV's performance relative to DES will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in DES or SDIV?

    The choice between DES and SDIV should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are DES and SDIV good investments?

    Both DES and SDIV can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between DES and SDIV?

    The correlation between DES and SDIV can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.