EEM VS SCHE: A Comparison of ETFs
Meta Description: A comprehensive analysis comparing EEM and SCHE, two prominent Emerging Markets ETFs. We delve into their structures, performance, and strategies to help you make an informed decision.
EEM Vs SCHE
Emerging markets have long been an attractive investment option for those looking to diversify their portfolios and take advantage of high-growth opportunities. Within this sector, EEM and SCHE are two ETFs that often catch investors' attention. In this blog, we take a detailed look at EEM Vs SCHE to help you understand the pros and cons of each fund, and decide which might be the better fit for your investment strategy.
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is managed by BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager. BlackRock has a reputation for providing a wide range of high-quality financial products and is known for its robust risk management strategies.
The Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) is offered by Charles Schwab, a leading financial services firm in the United States. Charles Schwab is recognized for its client-centric approach and low-cost investment solutions.
EEM Vs SCHE: Fund Structures
One of the first things investors notice when comparing EEM and SCHE is their structure. EEM is based on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while SCHE tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both indices include large and mid-cap stocks from emerging countries but differ in their allocation and weighting methods.
EEM overlap EEM VS SCHE: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
EEM Vs SCHE: Expense Ratios
When it comes to expense ratios, SCHE has a clear advantage. With an expense ratio of just 0.11%, SCHE is one of the most cost-effective ways to invest in emerging markets. On the other hand, EEM comes with a higher expense ratio of 0.69%, which can erode profits over time.
EEM Vs SCHE: Portfolio Diversification
Both EEM and SCHE offer decent portfolio diversification but differ in the specifics. EEM has a broader focus, incorporating a wide range of countries and sectors. SCHE, however, has a narrower focus, prioritizing larger and more stable emerging market economies.
In the context of liquidity, EEM holds the upper hand. It is a more established fund with a larger asset base and higher daily trading volumes. This makes it easier to buy and sell positions, especially for institutional investors.
Both EEM and SCHE have shown strong performance over the years, but they react differently to market conditions due to their distinct portfolios. EEM tends to be more volatile, offering higher highs but also facing deeper lows. SCHE provides a more steady, albeit slightly conservative, performance.
EEM Vs SCHE: Tax Efficiency
When it comes to tax efficiency, SCHE has the edge due to its structure. Its low turnover rate and strategic index tracking make it a tax-efficient choice for long-term investors.
Conclusion: The Final Word on EEM Vs SCHE
While both EEM and SCHE offer strong investment opportunities in emerging markets, they differ in many aspects such as expense ratios, liquidity, and performance. SCHE's low-cost structure and tax efficiency make it an excellent choice for long-term investors. EEM, with its high liquidity and broader market coverage, is better suited for those who seek to actively trade and diversify within the emerging markets.
Deciding between EEM and SCHE ultimately depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and strategy. Take the time to assess these factors and consult a financial advisor to make the best decision for your portfolio.
EEM ETF issuer
EEM ETF official page
EEM quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, access our dedicated page now.