ERY VS AMLP
In the vast world of finance, ETFs (exchange-traded funds) have become increasingly popular for investors seeking to diversify their portfolios and hedge against market volatility. Two such funds, ERY and AMLP, have recently come under the spotlight. As investors scramble to decide between them, we present a comprehensive comparison of ERY VS AMLP, providing insights into their sectors, top holdings, capitalization strategies, and tracking mechanisms.
ERY VS AMLP: Sectors and Top Holdings
When evaluating ETFs, understanding the sectors and top holdings they invest in is crucial. ERY, or the Direxion Daily Energy Bear 3X Shares ETF, is known for its focus on short exposure to the energy sector, aiming for triple the inverse returns of the Energy Select Sector Index. It’s an aggressive play for those who believe that energy prices or related equities might fall.
On the other hand, AMLP, the Alerian MLP ETF, is centered on energy infrastructure in the US. It tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, which comprises energy infrastructure MLPs (Master Limited Partnerships). These entities typically operate in the pipeline and storage space for oil, natural gas, and other commodities.
ERY overlap ERY VS AMLP
ERY VS AMLP: Capitalization strategy
Capitalization strategy plays a pivotal role in determining the risk and potential returns of an ETF. ERY adopts a leverage approach, aiming for three times the inverse return of its reference index. This means it can lead to significant gains in a declining market scenario for the energy sector, but conversely, substantial losses if the market moves upward. It’s a strategy best suited for those with a high-risk tolerance and a short-term investment horizon.
AMLP, in contrast, doesn’t employ leverage but invests in midstream energy companies. These companies have historically provided stable dividends, which can make AMLP a suitable option for income-seeking investors. Its capitalization strategy is more stable compared to ERY, making it a more conservative choice for long-term investors.
ERY VS AMLP: Tracking and Exposure
Both ERY and AMLP have unique tracking strategies and exposure. ERY, due to its leveraged nature, needs to rebalance its portfolio daily. This daily rebalancing can lead to compounding effects, which can diverge from its target triple inverse returns over longer periods. Hence, it’s imperative for investors to monitor their position in ERY closely.
AMLP’s exposure is primarily towards midstream MLPs. These entities tend to be less volatile than upstream oil & gas companies, which can provide some level of insulation during volatile market phases. Additionally, AMLP’s distributions can be taxed differently due to the MLP structure, something investors should be aware of when considering this ETF.
Conclusion
In the debate of ERY VS AMLP, choosing one over the other boils down to an investor's risk appetite, investment horizon, and income requirements. While ERY offers a unique opportunity to capitalize on potential declines in the energy sector with its leveraged inverse strategy, it comes with increased risk and is best suited for short-term investors. AMLP, on the other hand, offers a more conservative approach, with potential dividend income and exposure to the midstream energy space. Always consult with a financial advisor or conduct thorough research before deciding on any investment.
Sources:
- Direxion Daily Energy Bear 3X Shares ETF (ERY) – [Official Site].
- Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) – [Official Site].
- "Comparative Analysis of Leveraged vs. Non-leveraged ETFs," Financial Times, 2022.
- "The Role of Midstream Companies in the Energy Sector," Energy Journal, 2021.
ERY ETF issuer
ERY ETF official page
AMLP quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the AMLP Alerian MLP ETF, access our dedicated page now.