EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) play a crucial role in modern investment strategies, offering diversified exposure to various market segments and sectors. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: EWAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF) and FAUS (First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund). We'll explore key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

EWAS VS FAUS: Overview

EWAS and FAUS represent distinct investment approaches within the realm of international equities. While EWAS focuses on providing exposure to high-dividend-yielding companies across developed markets, FAUS employs an innovative stock selection methodology in the Australian equity space. Understanding these differing strategies is essential for investors looking to allocate their funds effectively.

EWAS VS FAUS: Sectors and Top Holdings

EWAS's portfolio is designed to capture the performance of companies with attractive dividend yields in developed markets outside the United States. In contrast, FAUS utilizes the AlphaDEX methodology to select and weight stocks within the Australian equity universe based on growth and value factors. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can help investors evaluate their potential for generating income and capital appreciation.

EWAS overlap EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsEWAS overlap EWAS VS FAUS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

EWAS VS FAUS: Capitalization and Strategy

EWAS boasts a considerable asset under management (AUM), reflecting its appeal to income-seeking investors. The ETF's strategy involves identifying companies with strong dividend potential in international markets. FAUS, on the other hand, applies a unique stock selection process to construct a portfolio of Australian companies with growth and value characteristics. Analyzing the capitalization and strategy of these ETFs assists investors in aligning their investment objectives with the appropriate fund.

EWAS VS FAUS: Tracking and Exposure

EWAS seeks to replicate the performance of the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Select Index, which comprises companies with a history of consistent dividend payments. FAUS tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Australia Index, a factor-based index that aims to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted indices through its stock selection process. Understanding the tracking methodology and exposure of these ETFs enables investors to make informed decisions based on their desired risk and return profiles.

Conclusion

EWAS and FAUS offer distinct investment opportunities within the international equity landscape, catering to investors with diverse goals and preferences. For those seeking a deeper understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, utilizing tools like ETF insider can be invaluable. This user-friendly app provides comprehensive information about these and other financial instruments, aiding investors in making well-informed choices.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

Get started