FDN VS SMH
3 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

FDN VS SMH

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors exposure to a wide array of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF) and SMH (VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF). We will explore various facets, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

FDN Vs SMH: Overview

FDN and SMH represent distinct investment opportunities within the technology industry. While FDN focuses on internet-related companies, SMH provides exposure to the semiconductor sector. This divergence in focus results in varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we will delve into in the subsequent sections.

FDN Vs SMH: Sectors and Top Holdings

The FDN ETF primarily invests in internet-based businesses, with top holdings including giants like Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet (Google). Conversely, SMH allocates its assets to semiconductor manufacturers such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), NVIDIA, and Intel. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in making informed decisions that align with their investment objectives.

FDN  overlap FDN VS SMHFDN overlap FDN VS SMH

FDN Vs SMH: Capitalization and Strategy

FDN boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the internet sector. On the other hand, SMH's strategy revolves around capitalizing on the growth potential of semiconductor companies. The variance in capitalization and strategy contributes to distinct risk-return dynamics, necessitating careful consideration from investors.

FDN Vs SMH: Tracking and Exposure

FDN aims to track the performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, providing investors with exposure to the internet industry's growth. In contrast, SMH tracks a market-cap-weighted index of global semiconductor companies, allowing investors to tap into the semiconductor industry's advancements. Recognizing the differences in tracking and exposure methodologies assists investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their investment goals.

Conclusion

FDN and SMH offer unique investment avenues, each catering to specific niches within the technology sector. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider empowers investors to gain comprehensive insights into these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is FDN better than SMH?

    FDN may be considered better than SMH for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does SMH beat FDN?

    SMH's performance relative to FDN will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in FDN or SMH?

    The choice between FDN and SMH should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are FDN and SMH good investments?

    Both FDN and SMH can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between FDN and SMH?

    The correlation between FDN and SMH can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.