FREL VS ICF
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

FREL VS ICF

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have gained immense popularity among investors seeking diversified exposure to various asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent Real Estate ETFs: FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF). We'll delve into the essential aspects of these ETFs, including ticker symbols, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

FREL VS ICF: Overview

FREL and ICF are both Real Estate ETFs, but they differ in their underlying indices and investment approaches. FREL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, providing broad exposure to U.S. real estate, including both REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) and real estate operating companies. In contrast, ICF follows the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, which focuses on larger U.S. REITs. These differences in index composition can impact performance and risk profiles, factors we will explore further.

FREL VS ICF: Sectors and Top Holdings

Understanding the sectors and top holdings within these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking specific real estate exposure. FREL encompasses a wide range of sectors, including residential, commercial, and specialized REITs. Its top holdings may include companies like Simon Property Group, Prologis, and American Tower Corporation. ICF, on the other hand, concentrates on the largest and most prominent REITs, potentially including Equity Residential, American Tower, and Public Storage. Analyzing these sectors and holdings can help investors align their portfolios with their real estate investment goals.

FREL overlap FREL VS ICFFREL overlap FREL VS ICF

n## FREL VS ICF: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
Capitalization and investment strategy play significant roles in ETF performance. FREL boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking comprehensive real estate exposure. Its strategy involves tracking a broad real estate index, offering diversification across various subsectors. In contrast, ICF's strategy centers on larger REITs, potentially resulting in concentrated exposure to specific segments of the real estate market. Investors must consider the differences in capitalization and strategy when deciding which ETF aligns with their investment objectives.

FREL VS ICF: Tracking and Exposure

The tracking methods employed by these ETFs impact their correlation with the underlying indices and their exposure to the real estate market. FREL closely follows the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index by investing in a diverse range of real estate companies. ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, focusing on the performance of larger REITs. The tracking approach chosen by each ETF can lead to variations in returns and risk. Investors should evaluate these tracking methods to select the ETF that best matches their investment preferences and risk tolerance.

Conclusion

FREL and ICF represent distinct opportunities for investors seeking exposure to the real estate sector. Their differences in index composition, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, and investment strategy make them suitable for various investment goals. To gain deeper insights into these ETFs, including their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical details, consider using ETF Insider—an user-friendly app designed to provide comprehensive information on financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

FREL ETF issuer
FREL ETF official page

FREL quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started