Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have reshaped the landscape of investing, providing individuals with a flexible and diversified approach to building their portfolios. In this article, we'll delve into a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) and PAGG (Invesco Global Agriculture ETF). We'll explore various dimensions, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.
FTAG and PAGG are two ETFs that revolve around the global agriculture sector. While FTAG focuses on capturing the performance of companies engaged in agricultural activities, PAGG aims to replicate the performance of the NASDAQ OMX Global Agriculture Index. This discrepancy in approach leads to distinct investment opportunities and risks, which we'll uncover in the subsequent sections.
The FTAG ETF is centered on a diverse range of agricultural companies, spanning across sectors such as crop production, livestock farming, and agricultural machinery. Its top holdings often include companies like Deere & Company, Archer-Daniels-Midland, and Nutrien Ltd. On the other hand, PAGG's holdings consist of globally recognized agriculture-related corporations, providing investors exposure to the broader agricultural industry. Comparing the sectors and top holdings assists investors in identifying the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives and risk appetite.
FTAG overlap FTAG VS PAGG
FTAG boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the agriculture sector. Its investment strategy revolves around capturing the performance of companies directly involved in agricultural activities. PAGG, however, pursues a strategy based on the performance of the NASDAQ OMX Global Agriculture Index, which includes both agriculture-related companies and companies engaged in the distribution of agricultural products. These differing capitalizations and investment strategies introduce varying potential returns and risk levels, necessitating careful consideration from investors.
FTAG's objective is to mirror the performance of the Indxx Global Agriculture Index, which encompasses a broad spectrum of agricultural companies. PAGG, alternatively, tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Agriculture Index, which provides exposure to various facets of the global agriculture industry. Understanding the nuances of tracking methodologies and exposure helps investors make informed decisions on which ETF suits their financial goals and risk preferences.
FTAG and PAGG emerge as distinctive ETFs, each catering to investors with specific interests in the global agriculture sector. For individuals seeking in-depth insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other intricate details, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool for exploration. With its user-friendly app, it delivers comprehensive information on these ETFs and a plethora of other financial instruments.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.
Sources:
Get startedFTAG may be considered better than PAGG for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
PAGG's performance relative to FTAG will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between FTAG and PAGG should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both FTAG and PAGG can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between FTAG and PAGG can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.