5 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider


Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and VHF (Vanguard Financials ETF). This analysis will encompass various critical aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure levels.

XLF Vs VHF: Overview

When it comes to financial sector ETFs, XLF and VHF are two distinct offerings that cater to different investment objectives. XLF seeks to track the performance of companies in the financial sector, encompassing banking, insurance, real estate, and other financial services. On the other hand, VHF concentrates on a broader range of financial institutions, spanning banking giants, investment firms, and insurance companies. The differences in their scope and focus result in varying risk and return profiles, which we will delve into in the subsequent sections.

XLF Vs VHF: Sectors and Top Holdings

The XLF ETF primarily focuses on financial services companies, which includes major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo, as well as diversified financial firms. In contrast, VHF's holdings extend to diverse financial subsectors, encompassing not only banking but also insurance, investment management, and financial exchanges. By understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs, investors can make informed decisions that align with their investment goals and risk tolerance.


XLF Vs VHF: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

XLF boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the financial sector. Its investment strategy centers on tracking the performance of financial companies within the S&P 500 Index. In contrast, VHF's approach aims to replicate the performance of a broader index that includes both U.S. and international financial companies. The differences in capitalization and investment strategy between XLF and VHF introduce distinct opportunities and risks for investors to consider.

XLF Vs VHF: Tracking Methods and Exposure

XLF employs a tracking strategy that involves replicating the composition and performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. As a result, investors gain exposure to companies engaged in various financial activities. VHF's approach involves tracking a benchmark that covers a broader spectrum of financial firms, which may lead to diversified exposure across different types of financial services providers. Understanding these tracking methods and exposure dynamics is crucial for selecting the ETF that aligns with an investor's preferences and risk appetite.


In the realm of financial sector ETFs, XLF and VHF stand as distinct options, each offering a specialized approach to accessing financial markets. For investors seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF insider serves as the ultimate tool. This user-friendly app provides comprehensive insights into these and other financial instruments, enabling investors to make well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

As the world of finance continually evolves, understanding the nuances of ETFs like XLF and VHF becomes essential for making well-informed investment decisions. Whether you're interested in gaining exposure to specific sectors within the financial industry or seeking diversified exposure across financial services, these ETFs offer valuable opportunities. By considering factors such as sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure, investors can tailor their portfolio to align with their financial goals and risk tolerance.
In conclusion, ETFs like XLF and VHF exemplify the innovation and versatility that ETFs bring to the investment landscape. As investors navigate the complexities of the financial markets, having access to tools like ETF insider can provide valuable insights that empower them to make sound investment choices. Remember that while information and analysis are valuable assets, it's important to conduct thorough research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.

GLDM quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, access our dedicated page now.

Get started


  • Why is GDXJ better than GLDM?

    GDXJ may be considered better than GLDM for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does GLDM beat GDXJ?

    GLDM's performance relative to GDXJ will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in GDXJ or GLDM?

    The choice between GDXJ and GLDM should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are GDXJ and GLDM good investments?

    Both GDXJ and GLDM can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between GDXJ and GLDM?

    The correlation between GDXJ and GLDM can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.