GLDL VS PHYS
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GLDL VS PHYS

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have brought a new dimension to investing, offering diversification and exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: GLDL (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust). Our exploration will encompass various dimensions such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

GLDL Vs PHYS: Overview

GLDL and PHYS are two ETFs that cater to investors' interest in gold. GLDL aims to track the performance of gold, while PHYS focuses on investing in physical gold bullion. This disparity in approach translates into distinct investment exposures and associated risks, a facet we will scrutinize in the ensuing sections.

GLDL Vs PHYS: Sectors and Top Holdings

The GLDL ETF predominantly concentrates on gold bullion, with its principal holding being physical gold. On the contrary, PHYS invests in physical gold stored in secure vaults. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs assists investors in determining the one that aligns with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

GLDL  overlap GLDL VS PHYSGLDL overlap GLDL VS PHYS

GLDL Vs PHYS: Capitalization and Strategy

GLDL boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), which underscores its popularity among investors looking for exposure to gold's value. The strategy of PHYS revolves around owning and storing physical gold in secure vaults, providing investors with direct ownership of this precious metal. The variation in capitalization and strategy between these two ETFs underscores their potential for returns and associated risk, necessitating thoughtful evaluation by investors.

GLDL Vs PHYS: Tracking and Exposure

GLDL seeks to replicate the performance of gold by holding gold bullion in a secure vault, while PHYS offers investors a way to own and hold physical gold. The methods of tracking and exposure differ: GLDL tracks gold's price movements through its bullion holdings, whereas PHYS offers direct ownership of gold stored in secure locations. Familiarity with the distinct tracking and exposure mechanisms aids investors in selecting the ETF that best aligns with their investment goals and risk appetite.

Conclusion

GLDL and PHYS are distinct ETFs, each providing a unique avenue for investors to participate in the gold market. For those seeking an in-depth exploration of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insightful information, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider offers comprehensive details about these ETFs and other financial instruments, aiding investors in making informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not offer any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is GLDL better than PHYS?

    GLDL may be considered better than PHYS for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does PHYS beat GLDL?

    PHYS's performance relative to GLDL will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in GLDL or PHYS?

    The choice between GLDL and PHYS should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are GLDL and PHYS good investments?

    Both GLDL and PHYS can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between GLDL and PHYS?

    The correlation between GLDL and PHYS can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.