GLDM VS NUGT
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GLDM VS NUGT

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares). We'll delve into essential aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

GLDM Vs NUGT: Overview

GLDM and NUGT are distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies within the gold industry. While GLDM is designed to closely track the price of gold, NUGT seeks to amplify the returns of gold mining companies through a leveraged approach. These differing strategies lead to unique exposures and varying levels of risk, which we'll explore further in the subsequent sections.

GLDM Vs NUGT: Sectors and Top Holdings

The GLDM ETF primarily focuses on physical gold, and its predominant holding consists of gold bullion. In contrast, NUGT is invested in the stocks of gold mining companies, such as Newmont Corporation, Barrick Gold, and Kinross Gold. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs enables investors to align their investment goals with the appropriate fund, considering factors like industry outlook and risk tolerance.

GLDM  overlap GLDM VS NUGTGLDM overlap GLDM VS NUGT

GLDM Vs NUGT: Capitalization and Strategy

GLDM boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors who seek exposure to the intrinsic value of gold. NUGT's strategy revolves around magnifying the performance of gold mining companies, making it a choice for those with a bullish outlook on the industry. The differences in capitalization and strategy between GLDM and NUGT introduce varying potentials for returns and risk, necessitating careful consideration by investors.

GLDM Vs NUGT: Tracking and Exposure

GLDM's objective is to provide investors with exposure to the daily fluctuations in the price of gold. Conversely, NUGT aims to deliver double the daily returns of a specific gold mining index, leveraging its exposure to the industry. The tracking methodologies differ—GLDM tracks gold bullion prices, while NUGT tracks a leveraged index of gold mining stocks. Recognizing the nuances in tracking and exposure strategies assists investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

Conclusion

GLDM and NUGT stand as unique investment vehicles, offering specialized approaches to navigating the gold market. For individuals seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF Insider emerges as an indispensable tool. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider empowers investors with comprehensive details on these and various other financial instruments, aiding them in making informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

NUGT quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is GLDM better than NUGT?

    GLDM may be considered better than NUGT for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does NUGT beat GLDM?

    NUGT's performance relative to GLDM will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in GLDM or NUGT?

    The choice between GLDM and NUGT should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are GLDM and NUGT good investments?

    Both GLDM and NUGT can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between GLDM and NUGT?

    The correlation between GLDM and NUGT can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.