GLL VS DGL
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GLL VS DGL

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have reshaped the landscape of modern investing, offering diversified exposure to a wide range of asset classes. In this article, we will undertake a thorough comparison between two prominent precious metal ETFs: GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and DGL (Invesco DB Gold Fund). Our exploration will encompass key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methodologies, and exposure.

GLL VS DGL: Overview

GLL and DGL are two distinct ETFs that cater to different strategies within the precious metal market. GLL is designed to provide inverse exposure to the price of gold, offering investors a way to capitalize on declining gold prices. In contrast, DGL aims to track the performance of gold futures contracts. This divergence in investment approach results in differing risk profiles and returns, which we will delve into in the upcoming sections.

GLL VS DGL: Sectors and Top Holdings

GLL primarily focuses on benefiting from declining gold prices, and its holdings consist of financial instruments that allow investors to profit from gold's downturn. On the other hand, DGL invests in gold futures contracts, effectively offering exposure to the price movements of gold itself. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking to align their investment goals with the appropriate precious metal strategy.

GLL overlap GLL VS DGLGLL overlap GLL VS DGL

GLL VS DGL: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

GLL, due to its inverse nature, attracts investors looking to hedge against potential declines in gold prices. This can lead to significant capital flows, impacting the fund's asset under management (AUM). DGL, as a fund tracking gold futures, is influenced by factors such as changes in gold market sentiment, interest rates, and supply and demand dynamics. Evaluating the differences in capitalization and investment strategy between these ETFs is paramount to making informed investment decisions.

GLL VS DGL: Tracking Methodology and Exposure

GLL's objective is to provide twice the inverse of the daily performance of gold bullion. It accomplishes this through the use of financial derivatives such as futures contracts and options. DGL, on the other hand, tracks the performance of an index composed of gold futures contracts. This tracking methodology allows investors to gain exposure to gold without physically owning the metal. Understanding how these ETFs track their underlying assets is crucial for investors to anticipate potential returns and risks.

Conclusion

GLL and DGL represent unique opportunities for investors seeking exposure to precious metals through different lenses. Whether one is interested in profiting from declining gold prices or gaining exposure to gold's performance through futures contracts, these ETFs offer diverse avenues for participation. For investors looking to dive deeper into understanding holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, the ETF Insider app provides a comprehensive tool. With its user-friendly interface, the app enables investors to access crucial information about various financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

GLL ETF issuer
GLL ETF official page

Get started