GLL VS PHYG
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GLL VS PHYG

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investment strategies, offering exposure to a wide range of assets. In this article, we will embark on a comprehensive comparison between two notable Precious Metals ETFs: GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and PHYG (iShares Physical Gold ETF). We'll delve into various aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

GLL vs. PHYG: Overview

GLL and PHYG are two Precious Metals ETFs that cater to different investment objectives within the realm of precious metals. While GLL seeks to provide inverse exposure to the daily performance of gold, PHYG offers direct exposure to physical gold bullion. This divergence in focus results in distinct risk and return profiles, which we will dissect in the subsequent sections.

GLL vs. PHYG: Sectors and Top Holdings

The GLL ETF operates with the intention of delivering twice the inverse daily performance of gold bullion. In contrast, PHYG owns and holds physical gold, providing investors with a direct and tangible link to the precious metal's value. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is pivotal for investors to align their portfolio with their investment goals and preferences.

GLL overlap GLL VS PHYGGLL overlap GLL VS PHYG

GLL vs. PHYG: Capitalization and Strategy

The ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) ETF boasts a noteworthy asset under management (AUM), reflective of its popularity among investors who seek to capitalize on declining gold prices. On the other hand, the iShares Physical Gold ETF (PHYG) focuses on the strategy of owning and storing gold bullion to track the precious metal's value. The disparity in capitalization and strategy introduces distinct opportunities and risks for investors to consider.

GLL vs. PHYG: Tracking and Exposure

GLL's primary objective is to offer investors inverse exposure to the daily price movements of gold bullion. This means that as the price of gold declines, GLL aims to increase in value. PHYG, on the other hand, tracks the physical gold price itself, giving investors a direct link to the precious metal's performance. The differing tracking and exposure methods necessitate a thorough understanding of the investment approach that aligns with individual investment goals.

Conclusion

GLL and PHYG exemplify two distinct approaches to investing in precious metals. Whether one seeks to hedge against gold price declines or own physical gold for long-term preservation, these ETFs cater to a variety of investor preferences. For those who wish to explore deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other financial instruments, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors to gain comprehensive insights and make informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:

ProShares: https://www.proshares.com/funds/gll.html
iShares: https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239853/ishares-physical-gold-etf

GLL ETF issuer
GLL ETF official page

Get started