GOEX VS FKRCX
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GOEX VS FKRCX

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and FKRCX (Fidelity Select Gold Fund). We'll analyze a range of factors including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

GOEX Vs FKRCX: Overview

GOEX and FKRCX are two distinct ETFs that cater to investors with differing strategies within the gold industry. GOEX focuses on companies engaged in gold exploration, whereas FKRCX concentrates on investing in stocks of companies engaged in gold mining and production. Understanding the specific goals of each ETF is crucial for making informed investment decisions.

GOEX Vs FKRCX: Sectors and Top Holdings

GOEX's primary sector is gold exploration, and it invests in companies actively engaged in the process of discovering new gold deposits. On the other hand, FKRCX targets the broader gold mining sector, investing in companies involved in extracting and producing gold. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs provides insight into the types of companies they encompass and the potential risks associated with their respective sectors.

GOEX  overlap GOEX VS FKRCXGOEX overlap GOEX VS FKRCX

GOEX Vs FKRCX: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

GOEX's asset under management (AUM) reflects its focus on gold exploration companies, making it an attractive option for investors interested in tapping into potential discoveries. FKRCX, with its emphasis on established gold mining and production companies, has a different risk and return profile. The investment strategy and capitalization of these ETFs play a significant role in shaping their performance and suitability for various investor preferences.

GOEX Vs FKRCX: Tracking Methods and Exposure

GOEX tracks an index composed of global gold explorers, allowing investors to gain exposure to the early stages of gold discovery. FKRCX, on the other hand, tracks a selection of gold mining and production companies. The tracking methods employed by these ETFs directly influence the type of exposure they provide to investors, ranging from potential discoveries to established mining operations.

Conclusion

In the dynamic world of ETFs, GOEX and FKRCX stand out as unique investment opportunities for those interested in the gold industry. The choice between them hinges on investors' preferences for either investing in companies exploring new gold deposits or established gold mining and production enterprises. To gain deeper insights into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial information, ETF Insider emerges as an invaluable tool. Its user-friendly app facilitates a comprehensive understanding of these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

GOEX quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is GOEX better than FKRCX?

    GOEX may be considered better than FKRCX for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does FKRCX beat GOEX?

    FKRCX's performance relative to GOEX will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in GOEX or FKRCX?

    The choice between GOEX and FKRCX should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are GOEX and FKRCX good investments?

    Both GOEX and FKRCX can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between GOEX and FKRCX?

    The correlation between GOEX and FKRCX can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.