GSG VS CMDY

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have brought a new dimension to the world of investing, offering diversified exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF). Our exploration will cover crucial aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

GSG Vs CMDY: Overview

GSG and CMDY are distinct ETFs that focus on different approaches to commodity investment. GSG tracks the S&P GSCI Commodity Index, providing broad exposure to various commodities such as energy, metals, and agriculture. In contrast, CMDY employs a roll strategy to optimize exposure to commodity futures contracts. This fundamental difference in their investment strategies is a key factor in evaluating the potential benefits and risks associated with each ETF.

GSG Vs CMDY: Sectors and Top Holdings

GSG's sector allocation spans commodities like energy, agriculture, industrial metals, and precious metals. The ETF holds various futures contracts representing these sectors. CMDY, on the other hand, selects commodities based on backwardation, contango, and liquidity considerations. The top holdings of CMDY are determined through its optimized rolling strategy, which takes into account contract maturity and cost of carry. Understanding the composition of these ETFs' sectors and top holdings is vital for investors aiming to align their investment portfolios with specific commodity sectors.

GSG overlap GSG VS CMDY

GSG Vs CMDY: Capitalization and Strategy

GSG has a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking broad commodity exposure. Its strategy involves tracking the performance of the S&P GSCI Commodity Index, which includes contracts for energy, metals, and agricultural commodities. CMDY, meanwhile, follows a unique strategy designed to mitigate the effects of contango and maximize exposure to backwardation in commodity futures. The different capitalization levels and investment strategies of GSG and CMDY contribute to their distinctive risk and return profiles.

GSG Vs CMDY: Tracking and Exposure

GSG's tracking methodology involves holding futures contracts that represent the commodities in the S&P GSCI Commodity Index. This approach aims to mirror the performance of the index, offering investors a way to gain exposure to the broader commodity market. CMDY's strategy revolves around selecting futures contracts with optimal roll yields, aiming to capture returns related to the term structure of commodity futures markets. Investors must understand the tracking methods of these ETFs to make informed decisions based on their commodity exposure preferences.

Conclusion

GSG and CMDY cater to distinct investor preferences when it comes to commodity exposure. GSG offers a comprehensive approach by tracking the S&P GSCI Commodity Index, while CMDY employs a specialized roll strategy to optimize exposure to commodity futures contracts. For individuals looking to gain deeper insights into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other intricate details of these ETFs, the ETF Insider app provides an invaluable resource. With its user-friendly interface, the app offers extensive information on a wide range of financial instruments, including ETFs, empowering investors to make well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

GSG quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity Indexed Trust, access our dedicated page now.

Get started