ICLN VS FAN: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF). We'll explore key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.
ICLN VS FAN: Overview
ICLN and FAN are distinct ETFs that focus on different segments within the renewable energy industry. While ICLN provides exposure to a broader spectrum of clean energy sources, FAN is centered specifically on wind energy. This divergence in focus leads to varying risk and return profiles, which we'll dissect in the subsequent sections.
ICLN VS FAN: Sectors and Top Holdings
The ICLN ETF is designed to encompass multiple clean energy sectors, including solar, wind, and other renewable sources. Its top holdings feature companies like Enphase Energy, Plug Power, and First Solar. On the other hand, FAN is concentrated on the wind energy sector, with top holdings such as Vestas Wind Systems and Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in choosing the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.
ICLN overlap ICLN VS FAN: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
ICLN VS FAN: Capitalization and Strategy
ICLN boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the clean energy revolution. FAN's strategy revolves around capturing the performance of global wind energy companies. The variance in capitalization and strategy between these two ETFs introduces distinct potential for returns and risk, necessitating thoughtful consideration by investors.
ICLN VS FAN: Tracking and Exposure
ICLN seeks to provide investors with comprehensive exposure to various clean energy sources, with holdings spanning solar, wind, and more. FAN, on the other hand, focuses exclusively on the wind energy sector. ICLN's tracking method involves replicating an index of global clean energy companies, while FAN aims to mirror an index of global wind energy companies. Understanding these tracking and exposure strategies assists investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their investment goals.
Conclusion
ICLN and FAN are distinct ETFs, each offering a specialized approach to investing in the renewable energy space. For those looking to gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, ETF Insider serves as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it offers extensive details about these and other financial instruments, empowering investors to make informed decisions.
Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.
Sources:
ICLN ETF issuer
ICLN ETF official page
ICLN quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, access our dedicated page now.