IUSG VS IWF: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

IUSG VS IWF: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment landscape by offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: IUSG (iShares Russell 3000 Growth ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 ETF). We'll delve into their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

IUSG VS IWF: Overview

IUSG and IWF are both ETFs with a focus on the Russell index series, but they cater to different segments of the market. While IUSG targets growth-oriented companies across the broader market, IWF concentrates on the larger-cap stocks in the Russell 1000 Index. These distinctions in focus lead to varying investment characteristics, which we will explore further.

IUSG VS IWF: Sectors and Top Holdings

The IUSG ETF emphasizes growth companies across various sectors, including technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary. Some of its top holdings include technology giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon. In contrast, IWF primarily holds stocks from the Russell 1000 Index, offering exposure to established companies across different sectors such as finance, technology, and healthcare. Understanding the sectors and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investment strategies with their objectives.

IUSG overlap IUSG VS IWF: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsIUSG overlap IUSG VS IWF: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

IUSG VS IWF: Capitalization and Strategy

IUSG's strategy revolves around capturing the growth potential of companies, often characterized by their strong earnings growth and innovative capabilities. The ETF has a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking exposure to growth-focused stocks. IWF, on the other hand, takes a broader approach by including larger-cap companies, providing stability and a mix of established firms. The divergence in capitalization and strategy contributes to varying risk and return profiles, enabling investors to make informed decisions.

IUSG VS IWF: Tracking and Exposure

IUSG aims to track the performance of the Russell 3000 Growth Index, which includes companies with high growth potential. In contrast, IWF seeks to replicate the performance of the Russell 1000 Index, encompassing a wide array of large-cap stocks. Both ETFs employ different approaches to achieve their tracking objectives, with IUSG focusing on growth-oriented stocks and IWF offering exposure to a broader range of established companies.

Conclusion

IUSG and IWF provide investors with distinctive investment opportunities within the broader market. Those interested in gaining deeper insights into the holdings, correlations, and other valuable information can turn to ETF insider. This user-friendly app equips investors with the tools to explore these and other financial instruments, helping them make informed decisions based on their investment goals and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational purposes and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

IUSG ETF issuer
IUSG ETF official page

IWF quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started