Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, offering a diversified and accessible way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis of two prominent ETFs: IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF). We'll delve into crucial aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
IVV and FXI are two ETFs with distinct focuses. IVV seeks to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 index, composed of 500 leading US companies. On the other hand, FXI aims to track the performance of large-cap Chinese stocks. Understanding these divergent approaches is essential for investors seeking exposure to either the US or Chinese markets.
IVV's portfolio is diversified across multiple sectors, including technology, healthcare, finance, and consumer goods. Its top holdings comprise major US corporations such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. In contrast, FXI concentrates on sectors like financials, technology, and consumer discretionary, with its leading holdings including Tencent, Alibaba, and China Construction Bank. Evaluating sector allocations and top holdings aids investors in aligning their investments with specific industry preferences.
IVV overlap IVV VS VWO
IVV boasts substantial assets under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking broad exposure to the US market. Its investment strategy involves replicating the performance of the S&P 500, a market-cap-weighted index. FXI, meanwhile, focuses on China's largest companies and utilizes a similar approach. The differing market capitalizations and investment strategies between the two ETFs translate into distinct potential returns and risk levels.
IVV tracks the S&P 500 index through physical replication, meaning it holds a proportionate share of the underlying stocks. FXI employs a similar methodology, aiming to mirror the performance of the FTSE China 50 Index by holding a basket of Chinese equities. Understanding these tracking methods is crucial for assessing how closely an ETF mirrors its benchmark index, thereby determining its potential for tracking error.
In the realm of ETF investing, IVV and FXI present investors with distinct opportunities. Whether one seeks broad exposure to the US market's leading companies or targeted exposure to China's largest stocks, these ETFs cater to diverse investment strategies. For those looking to gain more profound insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other financial intricacies, ETF Insider stands as the ultimate tool. This user-friendly app empowers investors to explore these details and more for a well-informed investment decision-making process.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not offer investment advisory services.
Sources:
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, access our dedicated page now.
IVV may be considered better than VWO for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
VWO's performance relative to IVV will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between IVV and VWO should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both IVV and VWO can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between IVV and VWO can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.