IXJ VS FXH
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become increasingly popular among investors, providing exposure to various sectors and industries. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent healthcare ETFs: IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) and FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund). We will explore key aspects such as ticker symbols, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
IXJ VS FXH: Overview
IXJ and FXH are both ETFs focused on the healthcare sector, but they differ in their investment strategies. IXJ aims to provide global exposure to the healthcare industry, while FXH utilizes an alpha-seeking approach by selecting healthcare stocks based on specific factors. Understanding these differences is crucial for investors seeking exposure to the healthcare sector.
IXJ VS FXH: Sectors and Top Holdings
When considering healthcare ETFs, it's essential to examine the sectors and top holdings within each fund. IXJ provides diversified exposure across various healthcare subsectors, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and healthcare equipment. FXH, on the other hand, employs a unique methodology to select its holdings, potentially resulting in a different mix of healthcare companies. Analyzing these sectors and top holdings can help investors make informed decisions.
IXJ overlap IXJ VS FXH
IXJ VS FXH: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
Capitalization and investment strategy play a significant role in ETF performance. IXJ boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking broad exposure to the healthcare sector. FXH, with its alpha-seeking strategy, aims to outperform traditional healthcare indices. The difference in capitalization and investment strategy between these two ETFs can lead to varying risk and return profiles, making it essential for investors to consider their objectives.
IXJ VS FXH: Tracking and Exposure
Understanding how these ETFs track their respective indices and provide exposure is critical. IXJ seeks to replicate the performance of the S&P Global 1200 Healthcare Sector Index, providing investors with a diversified global healthcare exposure. FXH employs an alpha-seeking approach by selecting healthcare stocks based on factors like growth and value. The tracking and exposure methods used by these ETFs can impact their performance, and investors should align their preferences accordingly.
Conclusion
IXJ and FXH are distinct healthcare ETFs, each offering a unique approach to investing in the healthcare sector. For investors looking to delve deeper into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and various insights related to these ETFs and other financial instruments, consider using ETF Insider—an user-friendly app that provides comprehensive details. Remember that this article does not provide any investment advisory services.
Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.
IXJ quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF, access our dedicated page now.