Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have emerged as a powerful investment tool, allowing investors to gain exposure to specific sectors, industries, or asset classes with ease. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) and SMH (VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF). We'll delve into crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking mechanisms, and exposure.
The IXN and SMH ETFs cater to different segments of the technology industry. While IXN provides investors with global exposure to the technology sector, SMH hones in on the semiconductor industry. This fundamental distinction shapes their risk profiles and potential returns, aspects we will analyze in the upcoming sections.
The IXN ETF spans various sectors within the technology realm, from software and hardware to IT services and more. Its top holdings include tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon. In contrast, SMH focuses solely on semiconductor companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and NVIDIA. A deep understanding of their sectors and top holdings empowers investors to align their portfolios with their investment objectives.
IXN overlap IXN VS SMH
With a substantial asset under management (AUM), IXN reflects investors' interest in gaining broad exposure to the global tech market. On the other hand, SMH capitalizes on the semiconductor industry's growth potential. This distinction in capitalization and investment strategy translates into different risk and reward profiles, guiding investors in making informed decisions.
IXN's objective is to mirror the performance of the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology Index, capturing the performance of technology companies worldwide. SMH, on the other hand, focuses on the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, tracking the semiconductor industry's movements. Understanding these tracking methodologies is essential for investors seeking precise exposure to their desired tech sector.
IXN and SMH represent unique opportunities for investors to tap into the dynamic technology and semiconductor sectors, respectively. To gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable details, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate companion. This user-friendly app empowers investors to navigate through the complexities of ETFs and financial instruments, enabling better-informed investment decisions.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not offer investment advisory services.
Sources:
iShares. (n.d.). iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Link
VanEck. (n.d.). VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Link
Investopedia. (2021). Understanding Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). Link
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the IXN iShares Global Tech ETF, access our dedicated page now.
IXN may be considered better than SMH for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
SMH's performance relative to IXN will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between IXN and SMH should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both IXN and SMH can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between IXN and SMH can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.