LQD VS BND
When it comes to bond ETFs, two of the most commonly discussed are LQD and BND. Both ETFs have a significant presence in the market, and investors often find themselves comparing the two. This article delves deep into the differences and similarities between LQD and BND, offering insights on which might be the better choice for various investment objectives.
LQD VS BND: Sectors and Top Holdings
The iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) focuses predominantly on investment-grade corporate bonds. This means it's mainly comprised of bonds issued by companies, which are deemed to have a relatively low risk of default. Its top holdings frequently include bonds from well-established firms in sectors like technology, healthcare, and finance.
On the other hand, the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) takes a broader approach. While it includes corporate bonds, it also has substantial holdings in U.S. government and agency bonds. This diverse range of inclusions provides BND with a balance that can be less volatile during market upheavals, making it appealing to those seeking stability.
LQD overlap LQD VS BND
LQD VS BND: Capitalization strategy
Capitalization strategies for ETFs describe how assets within the ETF are weighted. For LQD, its strategy leans towards market capitalization. This implies that the most significant positions are often in bonds from the largest issuers, which can offer a concentration in particular industries or sectors depending on market trends.
BND, conversely, uses a sampling strategy to replicate the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Instead of buying all bonds in the index, it selects a representative sample. This strategy provides BND with a broad exposure across different bond sectors, ensuring its performance is in line with the entire U.S. bond market.
LQD VS BND: Tracking and Exposure
Both LQD and BND aim to track specific bond market indices. LQD tracks the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index, focusing on the most liquid portion of the investment-grade corporate bond market. This emphasis on liquidity ensures that LQD can manage substantial flows without greatly impacting bond prices.
BND, as previously mentioned, tracks the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. This index covers a wide spectrum of the bond market, including government, corporate, and international bonds. As such, BND provides investors with broader exposure to the entire U.S. bond market compared to LQD.
Conclusion
In the face-off between LQD and BND, the right choice largely depends on an investor's goals. If one seeks exposure specifically to investment-grade corporate bonds with a focus on liquidity, LQD might be the preferred pick. However, for investors desiring a more comprehensive view of the U.S. bond market, BND offers broader exposure.
It's crucial for investors to understand their risk tolerance, investment horizon, and objectives before deciding. As with any investment, conducting thorough research and possibly consulting with a financial advisor can aid in making the best choice for individual needs.
Sources:
- iShares by BlackRock. (2020). iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF. [Online]
- Vanguard. (2020). Total Bond Market ETF. [Online]
- Bloomberg. (2020). Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. [Online]
- Markit. (2020). iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index. [Online]
LQD ETF issuer
LQD ETF official page
LQD quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, access our dedicated page now.