MTUM VS MOMO
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

MTUM VS MOMO

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have emerged as powerful investment tools, allowing investors to access a wide range of assets and sectors with ease. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and MOMO (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF). We will delve into key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

MTUM Vs MOMO: Overview

MTUM and MOMO are distinct ETFs targeting different segments of the market. MTUM focuses on companies with strong momentum characteristics within the US equity market, while MOMO is geared towards the cannabis industry. Understanding the unique attributes of these ETFs is essential for investors looking to align their portfolio with specific trends and opportunities.

MTUM Vs MOMO: Sectors and Top Holdings

MTUM's primary emphasis is on sectors that exhibit strong momentum, such as technology, consumer discretionary, and healthcare. On the other hand, MOMO offers exposure to companies within the legal cannabis industry, including producers, suppliers, and distributors. Diving into the sectors and top holdings provides insights into the underlying assets driving each ETF's performance.

MTUM  overlap MTUM VS MOMOMTUM overlap MTUM VS MOMO

MTUM Vs MOMO: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

MTUM boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking to capitalize on momentum-driven strategies. MOMO's investment strategy revolves around the legal cannabis market, potentially offering growth opportunities as the industry evolves. Evaluating the capitalization and investment strategy aids investors in determining the risk-reward profiles of these ETFs.

MTUM Vs MOMO: Tracking Methods and Exposure

MTUM seeks to track an index of US large and mid-cap stocks with strong momentum characteristics. MOMO, on the other hand, provides exposure to companies within the cannabis industry, a sector that has gained significant attention in recent years. The tracking methods employed by these ETFs play a crucial role in delivering the intended exposure to investors.

Conclusion

MTUM and MOMO offer unique avenues for investors to access specific market segments. MTUM taps into momentum-driven trends within the US equity market, while MOMO provides exposure to the budding cannabis industry. As investors seek to make informed decisions about their portfolios, ETF insider emerges as a valuable tool. This user-friendly app facilitates a deep dive into ETF holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, empowering investors to make more informed choices.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is MTUM better than MOMO?

    MTUM may be considered better than MOMO for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does MOMO beat MTUM?

    MOMO's performance relative to MTUM will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in MTUM or MOMO?

    The choice between MTUM and MOMO should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are MTUM and MOMO good investments?

    Both MTUM and MOMO can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between MTUM and MOMO?

    The correlation between MTUM and MOMO can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.