PFM VS QDF
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of modern investing, offering investors diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will delve into an exhaustive comparison between two prominent ETFs: PFM (PowerShares Dividend Achievers Portfolio) and QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund). We'll explore a range of facets including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.
PFM Vs QDF: Overview
PFM and QDF represent two distinct strategies within the realm of dividend-focused ETFs. While PFM aims to track the performance of companies with a consistent history of increasing dividends, QDF targets high-quality dividend-paying companies with a defensive approach. These differences in objectives translate to varying portfolio compositions and risk profiles, which we will dissect in the upcoming sections.
PFM Vs QDF: Sectors and Top Holdings
The PFM ETF primarily focuses on companies from various sectors that exhibit a strong track record of dividend growth. On the other hand, QDF emphasizes quality dividend-paying companies from sectors like Consumer Staples, Utilities, and Healthcare. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is essential for investors seeking dividend income and stability in their portfolios.
PFM overlap PFM VS QDF
PFM Vs QDF: Capitalization and Strategy
With a substantial asset under management (AUM), PFM showcases its popularity among investors seeking reliable dividend income. QDF's strategy revolves around selecting companies with a combination of attractive dividends and defensive characteristics. The differences in capitalization and strategic approaches influence the potential returns and risk profiles of these two ETFs, making due diligence crucial for investors.
PFM Vs QDF: Tracking Methods and Exposure
PFM's goal is to mirror the performance of the Dividend Achievers Index, consisting of companies with a history of increasing dividends. QDF, on the other hand, tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, focusing on companies with sustainable dividend payments and stable fundamentals. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure strategies aids investors in aligning their portfolios with their income and risk preferences.
Conclusion
In the realm of dividend-focused ETFs, PFM and QDF offer distinctive approaches that cater to different investor needs. For those eager to dive deeper into the intricacies of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors to gain comprehensive insights into these ETFs and other financial instruments.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.
Sources:
QDF quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund, access our dedicated page now.
FAQ
Why is PFM better than QDF?
PFM may be considered better than QDF for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
Does QDF beat PFM?
QDF's performance relative to PFM will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
Should I invest in PFM or QDF?
The choice between PFM and QDF should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Are PFM and QDF good investments?
Both PFM and QDF can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
What is the correlation between PFM and QDF?
The correlation between PFM and QDF can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.