PHO VS CGW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
In the world of investing, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide a convenient and effective way to diversify your portfolio. Two of the most prominent ETFs in the water industry are PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and CGW (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF). In this blog post, we'll dive into a side-by-side comparison of these two funds to help you decide which might be a better fit for your investment strategy.
PHO Vs CGW Overview
The Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) aims to track the performance of the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, primarily focusing on companies that create products to conserve and purify water. On the other hand, the Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) seeks to replicate the S&P Global Water 50 Index, targeting companies around the world that are involved in water-related businesses.
PHO Vs CGW Sectors and Top Holdings
PHO largely focuses on U.S-based companies and leans heavily towards industrials and utilities. The top holdings in PHO generally include companies such as Danaher Corp, IDEXX Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. CGW, however, has a more global exposure, targeting both developed and emerging markets. It includes sectors like utilities, industrials, and healthcare, featuring top holdings like Veolia Environnement, Suez, and American Water Works.
PHO overlap PHO VS CGW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
PHO Vs CGW Capitalization Strategy
PHO has a significant inclination towards mid-cap and small-cap companies, making it slightly more volatile but potentially more rewarding in terms of growth. In contrast, CGW focuses more on large-cap stocks, offering stability and possibly lower returns in comparison to PHO. Both ETFs are managed by Invesco, a global independent investment management company.
PHO Vs CGW Tracking and Exposure
PHO tracks the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index and invests primarily in U.S. companies. This offers a narrow but deep exposure to the U.S. water sector. CGW tracks the S&P Global Water 50 Index, providing a broader but shallower exposure to the global water industry. Both funds employ passive investment strategies, aiming to replicate the performance of their respective indices as closely as possible.
Conclusion:
When it comes to investing in water ETFs, both PHO and CGW present unique opportunities and challenges. PHO offers targeted exposure to the U.S. water sector, focusing on mid to small-cap companies, while CGW offers a broader, more diversified exposure to the global water industry through large-cap stocks. Both are managed by Invesco, a reputable issuer in the ETF space.
Your choice between PHO and CGW should be based on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and need for international exposure. No matter what you choose, investing in water is not just a potential money-maker; it's a step towards supporting an industry that is crucial for global sustainability.
PHO ETF issuer
PHO ETF official page
PHO quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF, access our dedicated page now.