PHYS VS GLDM
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

PHYS VS GLDM

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of modern investment by offering diverse exposure to various asset classes and sectors. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent gold-focused ETFs: PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust). Our analysis will cover critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

PHYS VS GLDM: Overview

PHYS and GLDM are two ETFs that cater to investors interested in gaining exposure to the gold market. However, they differ in terms of their approaches. PHYS is backed by physical gold bullion, providing a direct link to the precious metal's price movements. GLDM, on the other hand, offers exposure to the gold market through a fractional ownership of physical gold bars. These distinct approaches lead to different risk profiles and potential returns, which we will delve into further.

PHYS VS GLDM: Sectors and Top Holdings

The composition of PHYS and GLDM varies when it comes to sectors and top holdings. PHYS is focused solely on gold, with its primary holding being physical gold bullion stored in secure vaults. In contrast, GLDM aims to track the price of gold but also includes holdings in gold-related derivatives and cash equivalents. This difference in composition can impact how the ETFs respond to market movements and shifts in demand for gold.

PHYS overlap PHYS VS GLDMPHYS overlap PHYS VS GLDM

PHYS VS GLDM: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

Considering capitalization and investment strategy is essential for understanding an ETF's potential growth and risk. PHYS boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors looking for exposure to physical gold. GLDM's investment strategy focuses on providing investors with a low-cost option to gain exposure to the gold market. This difference in strategy can influence the ETFs' performance during various market conditions.

PHYS VS GLDM: Tracking Methods and Exposure

PHYS and GLDM employ distinct tracking methods to mirror the movements of the gold market. PHYS's value is tied directly to the price of physical gold, providing a close correlation. GLDM, on the other hand, tracks the gold price through a mix of physical gold bars and cash equivalents. Understanding these tracking methods is crucial for investors seeking precise exposure to the gold market or anticipating potential deviations from the underlying asset's price.

Conclusion

In the world of gold-focused ETFs, PHYS and GLDM offer investors distinct approaches to gaining exposure to the precious metal. If you're seeking deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other essential aspects, look no further than ETF Insider. With its user-friendly app, ETF Insider provides invaluable information about these and other financial instruments, allowing investors to make more informed decisions based on data-driven analysis.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) official website: [URL]
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) official website: [URL]

GLDM quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, access our dedicated page now.

Get started