PHYS VS GLL
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

PHYS VS GLL

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, offering investors a diversified way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold). Throughout the article, we will explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

PHYS Vs GLL: Overview

PHYS and GLL are two distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies within the gold sector. PHYS is designed to track the price of physical gold, while GLL seeks to provide investors with double the inverse daily performance of gold bullion. These contrasting approaches result in varied risk profiles and potential returns, which we will dissect in the following sections.

PHYS Vs GLL: Sectors and Top Holdings

PHYS primarily invests in physical gold bullion, making it a direct play on the price of gold itself. On the other hand, GLL utilizes derivatives to achieve its inverse performance objective, aiming to capitalize on downward price movements in gold. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking to align their investment choices with their specific goals and risk tolerance.

PHYS  overlap PHYS VS GLLPHYS overlap PHYS VS GLL

PHYS Vs GLL: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

PHYS boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors who seek exposure to the value of gold. In contrast, GLL employs an investment strategy that is geared towards benefiting from declines in gold prices. The differences in capitalization and investment strategy between PHYS and GLL result in unique potential outcomes for investors, emphasizing the need for careful consideration.

PHYS Vs GLL: Tracking Methods and Exposure

PHYS offers investors a straightforward way to gain exposure to the daily price movements of physical gold, making it a popular choice for those who want a direct play on gold's value. On the other hand, GLL utilizes derivatives to provide double inverse exposure to the same daily price movements of gold. It's important for investors to comprehend the nuances of these tracking methods and exposure mechanisms to make informed investment decisions.

Conclusion

PHYS and GLL represent two contrasting approaches to investing in the gold sector through ETFs. Each ETF offers a unique way to access the potential opportunities and risks associated with gold's price movements. For investors seeking deeper insights into ETF holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other pertinent information, ETF Insider stands as an invaluable tool. This user-friendly app provides an extensive range of insights into various financial instruments, aiding investors in making informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is PHYS better than GLL?

    PHYS may be considered better than GLL for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does GLL beat PHYS?

    GLL's performance relative to PHYS will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in PHYS or GLL?

    The choice between PHYS and GLL should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are PHYS and GLL good investments?

    Both PHYS and GLL can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between PHYS and GLL?

    The correlation between PHYS and GLL can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.