Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investment strategies, allowing investors to access diverse portfolios with ease. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF). Throughout this exploration, we will delve into essential aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.
The QQQ and FXI ETFs cater to distinct investment themes, targeting the technology sector and the Chinese market, respectively. QQQ, commonly referred to as the "Nasdaq-100 ETF," provides exposure to 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. On the other hand, FXI offers investors access to large-cap companies in China. Understanding their differing focuses is crucial for making informed investment decisions.
QQQ's portfolio is heavily concentrated in the technology sector, encompassing companies involved in areas such as software, hardware, internet commerce, and biotechnology. Prominent holdings include giants like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google). In contrast, FXI predominantly includes Chinese companies operating across diverse sectors like financials, technology, and consumer goods. Unveiling the sectors and top holdings assists investors in identifying potential growth drivers and risk factors.
QQQ overlap QQQ VS FXI
QQQ boasts a substantial market capitalization and is widely regarded as a benchmark for the performance of the technology sector. Its investment strategy involves tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, which represents the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. FXI, focusing on Chinese equities, seeks to replicate the performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. Understanding their capitalizations and investment strategies is fundamental for gauging their potential returns and vulnerabilities.
QQQ's tracking methodology involves replicating the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index through direct investment or derivatives. This strategy allows investors to gain exposure to the technological advancements driving the global economy. On the other hand, FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index, offering investors a window into the Chinese economy's growth trajectory. Recognizing these tracking methods and exposure facets guides investors in aligning their portfolios with their investment goals.
QQQ and FXI represent unique investment opportunities, catering to different sectors and markets. If you're eager to delve deeper into the intricacies of their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insightful metrics, ETF Insider is the ultimate tool at your disposal. With its user-friendly application, ETF Insider empowers investors to navigate these financial instruments' complexities and make well-informed decisions.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. It's essential to conduct thorough research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.
Sources:
Invesco QQQ Trust: https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?productId=QQQ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF: https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239637/ishares-china-largecap-etf
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, access our dedicated page now.
QQQ may be considered better than FXI for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
FXI's performance relative to QQQ will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between QQQ and FXI should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both QQQ and FXI can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between QQQ and FXI can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.