SKOR VS KOR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

SKOR VS KOR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Investing in South Korea has never been easier, thanks to a plethora of ETF options. Today, we're going to deep-dive into two bond-focused Korean ETFs: SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Long Corporate Bond Index Fund) and KOR (Kraneshares CCBS China Corporate High Yield Bond USD Index ETF). We'll explore their tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

SKOR > KOR: Overview

Though both SKOR and KOR ostensibly focus on bonds, their investment strategies are different. SKOR primarily invests in U.S. corporate bonds, albeit with a Korean focus. KOR, on the other hand, is committed to Chinese corporate high-yield bonds but is also an option for those looking to invest in the Korean market.

SKOR > KOR: Issuers and Their Influence

SKOR is a product of FlexShares, a well-known ETF issuer focused on investor outcomes. KOR is managed by KraneShares, a boutique asset manager that specializes in China-focused ETFs and other investment products. The issuer's reputation and specialization can be significant factors in the reliability and performance of the ETF.

SKOR overlap SKOR VS KOR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsSKOR overlap SKOR VS KOR: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

SKOR > KOR: Bond Sectors and Top Holdings

SKOR’s primary sectors include Industrial, Financial, and Utility bonds. Its top holdings feature well-known companies like Apple Inc. and Verizon. On the flip side, KOR is invested in sectors like Real Estate and Infrastructure, with top holdings in Chinese corporations like Tencent. Understanding the sectors and top holdings helps investors make educated decisions based on their risk tolerance and investment goals.

SKOR > KOR: Capitalization and Asset Under Management (AUM)

SKOR boasts a robust AUM, indicating high investor trust and liquidity. KOR, while not as large in terms of AUM, offers a niche investment strategy that could be appealing for those looking for diversification. Capitalization and AUM are vital metrics for assessing the scale, liquidity, and potential growth of these ETFs.

Conclusion

SKOR and KOR provide unique pathways for bond investment in the Korean market, each with its advantages and drawbacks. For investors keen on a more in-depth analysis, ETF Insider is an invaluable resource. The app offers detailed insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and much more, all wrapped up in a user-friendly interface.

Both SKOR and KOR offer specialized routes for investors interested in Korean bonds but through different lenses. SKOR, managed by FlexShares, leans towards U.S. corporate bonds with a Korean touch. In contrast, KOR, managed by KraneShares, takes a more China-centric approach but still serves as a gateway to Korean investments. Whether you're a seasoned investor or a newcomer, understanding the nuances between SKOR and KOR can help you make an informed decision tailored to your investment strategy and risk profile.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

SKOR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund, access our dedicated page now.

Get started