SOIL VS MOO
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

SOIL VS MOO

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become increasingly popular investment vehicles, offering exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent agricultural ETFs: SOIL (Global X Fertilizers/Potash ETF) and MOO (VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF). We will explore a range of factors, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

SOIL VS MOO: Overview

SOIL and MOO are both agricultural ETFs, but they focus on different aspects of the industry. SOIL provides exposure to companies in the fertilizers and potash industry, while MOO is designed to track agribusiness companies. These distinct focuses result in varying investment opportunities and risks, which we will delve into in the following sections.

SOIL VS MOO: Sectors and Top Holdings

SOIL primarily invests in companies related to fertilizers, potash, and agricultural chemicals. Its top holdings include Nutrien Ltd., Mosaic Co., and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. In contrast, MOO holds stocks in various agribusiness segments, including agriculture equipment, agri-chemicals, and food processing companies. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors to align their investment goals with the appropriate ETF.

SOIL overlap SOIL VS MOOSOIL overlap SOIL VS MOO

SOIL VS MOO: Capitalization and Strategy

SOIL and MOO differ in terms of asset under management (AUM) and investment strategy. SOIL, with its focused approach, has a specific target audience. On the other hand, MOO's strategy aims to capture the broader agribusiness sector's performance. These differences in capitalization and strategy can impact the potential for returns and risk, making it essential for investors to consider their objectives.

SOIL VS MOO: Tracking and Exposure

SOIL tracks an index of companies in the fertilizers and potash industry, aiming to provide investors with exposure to this specific sector's performance. MOO, on the other hand, seeks to replicate the performance of the Market Vectors Global Agribusiness Index, which includes agribusiness companies from various sub-sectors. Understanding these tracking methods and exposure strategies is crucial for investors to make informed decisions that align with their investment preferences.

Conclusion

SOIL and MOO are distinct agricultural ETFs, each catering to different aspects of the agricultural industry. To gain deeper insights into these ETFs' holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, consider utilizing ETF Insider, an invaluable tool for comprehensive analysis of financial instruments. This user-friendly app provides extensive details on these and other investment options.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Get started