SPMO VS VFMO
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

SPMO VS VFMO

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become increasingly popular in the world of finance due to their ability to provide diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF). We will explore essential aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

SPMO Vs VFMO: Overview

SPMO and VFMO are two ETFs that focus on capturing momentum within the U.S. equities market. While both ETFs target stocks with strong recent price performance, they do so with different methodologies and underlying indexes. This distinction impacts the sectors they include and the level of exposure to various companies within those sectors.

SPMO Vs VFMO: Sectors and Top Holdings

The SPMO ETF is designed to track an index that emphasizes momentum stocks across various sectors, including technology, consumer discretionary, and healthcare. In contrast, VFMO aims to follow an index composed of U.S. stocks with high exposure to momentum factors. This leads to different sector weightings and top holdings. By understanding these sectors and top holdings, investors can assess which ETF aligns better with their investment objectives.

SPMO  overlap SPMO VS VFMOSPMO overlap SPMO VS VFMO

SPMO Vs VFMO: Capitalization and Strategy

SPMO and VFMO differ in terms of their asset under management (AUM) and investment strategy. SPMO's AUM reflects its popularity among investors seeking exposure to momentum-driven stocks within the S&P 500. VFMO employs a factor-based approach that seeks to capture momentum while also maintaining diversification. The difference in capitalization and strategy can influence potential returns and risk levels for investors.

SPMO Vs VFMO: Tracking and Exposure

SPMO and VFMO utilize distinct methods to achieve their momentum-focused objectives. SPMO tracks an index that selects and weights stocks based on their momentum scores. VFMO, on the other hand, employs a rules-based approach to identify and allocate to stocks with strong momentum characteristics. These differing tracking and exposure methodologies have implications for how each ETF performs in different market conditions.

Conclusion

SPMO and VFMO are valuable investment options for those interested in gaining momentum exposure within the U.S. equities market. Their unique methodologies, sector allocations, and top holdings provide investors with choices to tailor their portfolios to their preferences. To delve further into the intricacies of these ETFs, including details on holdings, correlations, and insights, consider using ETF Insider. This user-friendly app empowers investors with comprehensive information on various financial instruments, aiding in informed decision-making.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

VFMO quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is SPMO better than VFMO?

    SPMO may be considered better than VFMO for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does VFMO beat SPMO?

    VFMO's performance relative to SPMO will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in SPMO or VFMO?

    The choice between SPMO and VFMO should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are SPMO and VFMO good investments?

    Both SPMO and VFMO can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between SPMO and VFMO?

    The correlation between SPMO and VFMO can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.