SSO VS FAZ: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape by providing investors with a diversified approach to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two notable ETFs: SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and FAZ (Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares). Throughout this analysis, we'll explore crucial aspects such as tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.
SSO VS FAZ: Overview
SSO and FAZ represent two contrasting strategies within the financial sector. SSO aims to provide investors with double the daily performance of the S&P 500 index, while FAZ is designed to offer triple inverse exposure to the daily performance of financial companies in the Russell 1000 Index. These differing investment objectives lead to distinct risk and return profiles, which we will delve into in the subsequent sections.
SSO VS FAZ: Sectors and Top Holdings
The SSO ETF primarily targets the technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary sectors, as it tracks the S&P 500 Index. Meanwhile, FAZ focuses on the financial sector, with top holdings including banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. Understanding these sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors seeking to align their portfolios with specific industries and market segments.
SSO overlap SSO VS FAZ: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
SSO VS FAZ: Capitalization and Strategy
SSO boasts a considerable Asset Under Management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors seeking leveraged exposure to the S&P 500. In contrast, FAZ's strategy revolves around capitalizing on the inverse performance of financial companies. The difference in capitalization and strategy between these ETFs contributes to their distinct potential for returns and risk, necessitating careful consideration by investors.
SSO VS FAZ: Tracking and Exposure
SSO aims to deliver double the daily returns of the S&P 500 index, making it suitable for investors bullish on the broader market. FAZ, however, offers triple inverse exposure to the daily performance of financial companies, catering to investors who anticipate downturns in the financial sector. The tracking mechanisms differ: SSO utilizes derivatives to magnify S&P 500 returns, while FAZ employs similar tools to amplify inverse financial sector returns.
Conclusion
SSO and FAZ represent distinct investment strategies within the financial sector, catering to different market views and risk appetites. Investors seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other financial instruments can turn to ETF Insider, an accessible app providing comprehensive details. By understanding the nuances of these ETFs and utilizing tools like ETF Insider, investors can make informed decisions aligned with their financial goals.
Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.
Sources:
ProShares: SSO - ProShares Ultra S&P500
Direxion: FAZ - Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
SSO ETF issuer
SSO ETF official page
FAZ quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares, access our dedicated page now.