Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become an indispensable tool in modern investing, offering exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and MOMO (ATMACK MSCI Breakout Momentum Index ETF). We will examine key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.
VFMO and MOMO are distinct ETFs designed to capture momentum in the U.S. equity market. While VFMO, managed by Vanguard, focuses on U.S. stocks displaying strong momentum, MOMO tracks an index of U.S. companies experiencing price breakouts. Understanding the fundamental differences between these two ETFs is essential for investors looking to capitalize on momentum-driven strategies.
VFMO's sector exposure includes a broad range of industries, with top holdings encompassing technology giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon. On the other hand, MOMO targets companies that have recently broken out in terms of price performance. This difference in sector focus and top holdings has a significant impact on the risk-return profile of each ETF.
VFMO overlap VFMO VS MOMO
VFMO boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors seeking exposure to momentum-driven stocks. The strategy behind VFMO involves capturing the upward momentum of stocks with a history of strong recent performance. MOMO, on the other hand, seeks to capitalize on the short-term price breakout phenomenon, making it appealing to traders seeking quick gains.
VFMO aims to mirror the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Momentum Index, which comprises large-cap U.S. stocks demonstrating momentum characteristics. In contrast, MOMO tracks the ATMACK MSCI Breakout Momentum Index, focusing on companies that have recently experienced significant price breakouts. Investors should consider their risk tolerance and investment horizon when deciding between these two approaches.
VFMO and MOMO offer unique opportunities for investors to tap into momentum-driven strategies in the U.S. equity market. While VFMO capitalizes on the momentum exhibited by well-established stocks, MOMO hones in on companies with recent price breakouts. For investors seeking comprehensive insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other key metrics, ETF Insider provides a user-friendly app that offers valuable information on these financial instruments.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.
Sources:
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) Fact Sheet
ATMACK MSCI Breakout Momentum Index ETF (MOMO) Prospectus
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF, access our dedicated page now.
VFMO may be considered better than MOMO for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
MOMO's performance relative to VFMO will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between VFMO and MOMO should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both VFMO and MOMO can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between VFMO and MOMO can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.