XLC VS FNGS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

XLC VS FNGS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, providing investors with a diversified means of gaining exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN). Our exploration will encompass key aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

XLC VS FNGS: Overview

XLC and FNGS represent two distinct ETFs, each offering exposure to unique corners of the market. XLC, managed by State Street Global Advisors, focuses on the Communication Services sector and tracks a specialized index. FNGS, an exchange-traded note issued by Bank of Montreal, targets the performance of the well-known FANG+ Index, encompassing major technology and internet-related companies. Delving into the overview of these ETFs reveals their contrasting approaches and underlying assets.

XLC VS FNGS: Sectors and Top Holdings

XLC predominantly centers on the Communication Services sector, including companies like Alphabet (Google), Facebook, and Walt Disney. Meanwhile, FNGS concentrates on high-performing technology giants, such as Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft. Recognizing the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs aids investors in comprehending their sectoral exposures and potential for growth.

XLC overlap XLC VS FNGS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsXLC overlap XLC VS FNGS: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

XLC VS FNGS: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

With a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), XLC is a sizable ETF that attracts investors seeking exposure to communication-oriented companies. On the other hand, FNGS focuses on capitalizing on the growth potential of influential tech and internet companies. The divergence in capitalization and investment strategy underscores the differing risk and return profiles of these two ETFs.

XLC VS FNGS: Tracking Methods and Exposure

XLC tracks the Communication Services Select Sector Index, designed to mirror the performance of communication-related companies within the S&P 500. FNGS, as an ETN, provides exposure to the FANG+ Index, which includes some of the most dynamic tech firms globally. The tracking methods and underlying indices of XLC and FNGS define the scope of their respective exposures and the market dynamics they capture.

Conclusion

XLC and FNGS offer investors distinct opportunities for exposure to specific sectors and industries. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, and overlaps within these ETFs, utilizing tools like ETF insider can provide valuable information. With its user-friendly interface, ETF insider empowers investors with comprehensive insights into these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services and should not be considered as financial advice.

Sources:

State Street Global Advisors. "Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC)." URL: [Insert URL]
Bank of Montreal. "MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS)." URL: [Insert URL]

Get started