ZHOK VS HKEW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

ZHOK VS HKEW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have redefined the investment landscape, providing investors with diversified exposure to a wide array of sectors and asset classes. In this comprehensive analysis, we will delve into the distinctive attributes of two prominent ETFs: ZHOK (BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Index ETF) and HKEW (ProShares Hedged FTSE Europe ETF). Our exploration will encompass crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

ZHOK VS HKEW: Overview

ZHOK and HKEW represent two distinct investment strategies within the ETF universe. ZHOK focuses on the US healthcare sector, offering equal-weight exposure to its constituents. In contrast, HKEW endeavors to provide investors with a hedged approach to European equities. These divergent strategies lead to varying risk profiles and exposures, which we will dissect further in the subsequent sections.

ZHOK VS HKEW: Sectors and Top Holdings

ZHOK, the BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Index ETF, centers its portfolio on the healthcare industry. It offers equal-weight exposure to companies involved in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, healthcare services, and medical equipment. On the other hand, HKEW targets European equities while employing a currency-hedging strategy. This implies that HKEW's holdings are geared towards European companies, but the impact of currency fluctuations is mitigated. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors aiming to align their investments with specific industry trends.

ZHOK overlap ZHOK VS HKEW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFsZHOK overlap ZHOK VS HKEW: A Comprehensive Comparison of ETFs

ZHOK VS HKEW: Capitalization and Strategy

ZHOK's capitalization and strategy reflect its commitment to equal-weight exposure. By ensuring that each constituent holds a similar weight in the portfolio, ZHOK aims to provide a balanced representation of the US healthcare sector. In contrast, HKEW's strategy revolves around European equities with a hedged approach. This strategy aims to minimize the impact of currency fluctuations, making it suitable for investors seeking exposure to European markets while managing currency risk.

ZHOK VS HKEW: Tracking and Exposure

ZHOK's objective is to closely track the performance of the BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Index. This index comprises US healthcare companies, and ZHOK's equal-weight methodology ensures that no single stock dominates the portfolio. HKEW, as a currency-hedged ETF, tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Europe Hedged Index. This index includes European companies while mitigating the impact of currency movements, providing investors with a more focused exposure to European equities.

Conclusion

ZHOK and HKEW embody distinct investment strategies tailored to specific sectors and regions. For investors seeking a comprehensive understanding of the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and valuable insights, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly application, ETF Insider equips investors with in-depth information about these and various other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:

BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Index ETF (ZHOK) - BMO Global Asset Management
ProShares Hedged FTSE Europe ETF (HKEW) - ProShares

ZHOK ETF issuer
ZHOK ETF official page

Get started