Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investment, offering diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis of two prominent ETFs: [ARKF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/arkf) (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and [PLAT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/plat) (WisdomTree Modern Tech Platforms Fund). We will explore a range of aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## ARKF Vs PLAT: Overview
ARKF and PLAT are two ETFs that represent distinct strategies within the technology and fintech sectors. While ARKF focuses on investing in innovative fintech companies, PLAT aims to capture the growth potential of modern technology platforms. This difference in investment approach leads to varied exposures and risks, which we will dissect in the upcoming sections.

## ARKF Vs PLAT: Sectors and Top Holdings
The ARKF ETF is centered around companies at the forefront of financial technology, including holdings like Square, PayPal, and Shopify. In contrast, PLAT invests in technology platforms like Amazon, Alphabet, and Facebook. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs allows investors to align their investment choices with their specific objectives and risk preferences.





![ARKF  overlap ARKF VS PLAT](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## ARKF Vs PLAT: Capitalization and Strategy
ARKF has garnered significant attention, evidenced by its substantial asset under management (AUM), as it seeks to capitalize on the ongoing fintech revolution. PLAT's strategy involves gaining exposure to the growth potential of modern tech platforms, making it an attractive option for investors seeking technology-driven opportunities. The disparity in capitalization and investment strategy influences potential returns and risk profiles, necessitating careful consideration by investors.

## ARKF Vs PLAT: Tracking and Exposure
ARKF's objective is to provide investors with exposure to fintech innovation by investing in companies disrupting the traditional financial sector. In contrast, PLAT delivers exposure to the performance of modern technology platforms. ARKF tracks a custom index developed by ARK Invest, while PLAT tracks an index developed by WisdomTree. Understanding these tracking methodologies and exposure strategies empowers investors to make informed decisions.

## Conclusion
ARKF and PLAT offer distinct investment opportunities within the realms of fintech and modern technology platforms. For investors seeking to gain deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, ETF insider emerges as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly application, ETF insider facilitates comprehensive exploration of various financial instruments, aiding investors in making well-informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

ARKF and PLAT offer distinct investment opportunities within the realms of fintech and modern technology platforms. Consider using ETF Insider.

ARKF Vs PLAT: Capitalization and Strategy

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment landscape, providing investors with an efficient way to access diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: [ARKF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/arkf) (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and [LEGR](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/legr) (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction &amp; Process ETF). We'll explore critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## ARKF Vs LEGR: Overview 
ARKF and LEGR are two distinct ETFs that offer exposure to different facets of the financial technology sector. ARKF, managed by ARK Invest, focuses on innovative companies disrupting the financial industry through technology-driven advancements. On the other hand, LEGR, managed by First Trust Advisors, targets companies involved in innovative transaction and process improvements. These differences in focus create varying opportunities and risks that investors should thoroughly assess.

## ARKF Vs LEGR: Sectors and Top Holdings 
The ARKF ETF covers a wide spectrum of financial technology sectors, including digital wallets, blockchain technology, peer-to-peer lending, and more. Some of its top holdings include companies like Square Inc., PayPal Holdings, and Zillow Group. LEGR, meanwhile, emphasizes industries such as electronic payment processing, financial exchanges, and automated financial services. Understanding these sectors and the top holdings of each ETF is crucial for investors seeking exposure to specific segments of the fintech sector.




![ARKF  overlap ARKF VS LEGR](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## ARKF Vs LEGR: Capitalization and Strategy 
ARKF has garnered significant attention due to its innovative investment strategy and active management approach. Its capitalization and asset under management have grown substantially, reflecting investor confidence in its unique investment thesis. LEGR, being focused on companies that drive transactional and process innovations, offers a different strategy with its own set of opportunities and risks. Investors must carefully evaluate the capitalization and strategy of each ETF based on their investment objectives.

## ARKF Vs LEGR: Tracking and Exposure 
ARKF aims to provide exposure to companies that are at the forefront of fintech innovation, and its investment team actively seeks out disruptors in the industry. LEGR, in contrast, seeks to track an index that includes companies engaged in innovative transaction and process improvements. This tracking difference impacts the kind of exposure investors can expect from each ETF. Understanding the tracking methodologies and exposure nuances helps investors make informed decisions.

## Conclusion
ARKF and LEGR are distinct ETFs catering to investors interested in the dynamic fintech sector. As you explore the potential of these ETFs, remember that in-depth insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical aspects can be gained through tools like ETF insider. This user-friendly app offers a wealth of information, enabling investors to make well-informed decisions based on comprehensive data.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

The ARKF ETF covers a wide spectrum of financial technology sectors, including digital wallets, blockchain technology, peer-to-peer lending, and more.

ARKF Vs LEGR: Tracking and Exposure

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have rapidly gained popularity among investors due to their ability to provide diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [ARKF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/arkf) (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and FINQ (Global X FinTech ETF). We'll delve into essential aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## ARKF Vs FINQ: Overview
ARKF and FINQ are distinct ETFs that cater to the fast-evolving fintech industry. While ARKF focuses on innovative companies driving advancements in financial technology, FINQ is designed to track the performance of global fintech firms. These differing objectives result in varied risk and return profiles, a factor we will explore in the subsequent sections.

## ARKF Vs FINQ: Sectors and Top Holdings
The ARKF ETF is heavily invested in a diverse range of sectors within fintech, including digital wallets, blockchain technology, peer-to-peer lending, and more. Its top holdings encompass companies such as Square, PayPal Holdings, and Shopify. On the other hand, FINQ's holdings comprise global fintech leaders like Adyen NV, Square, and Afterpay Ltd. Evaluating these sectors and top holdings aids investors in selecting an ETF that aligns with their investment preferences and risk tolerance.





![ARKF  overlap ARKF VS FINQ](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## ARKF Vs FINQ: Capitalization and Strategy
ARKF has amassed a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM) due to its focus on innovative fintech solutions. Its investment strategy revolves around identifying companies that leverage technology to disrupt traditional financial services. FINQ, with a different strategy, seeks to provide investors with exposure to the performance of established and emerging fintech players. These contrasting strategies impact the potential for returns and risk associated with each ETF, necessitating careful consideration from investors.

## ARKF Vs FINQ: Tracking and Exposure
ARKF is designed to closely track the performance of companies at the forefront of fintech innovation. Its exposure lies in identifying disruptive technologies that have the potential to reshape financial services. On the other hand, FINQ provides exposure to a broader spectrum of fintech firms, including those operating in areas such as digital payments, lending, and blockchain. Understanding the tracking methodologies and exposure strategies of these ETFs assists investors in making informed decisions based on their investment objectives.

## Conclusion
In the dynamic world of fintech, ARKF and FINQ present unique investment opportunities, each tailored to a specific niche within the industry. For investors seeking comprehensive insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information, ETF Insider emerges as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly application, ETF Insider empowers investors to delve deeper into these financial instruments and make informed investment choices.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

In this article, we'll conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and FINQ (Global X FinTech ETF).

ARKF Vs FINQ: Sectors and Top Holdings

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a cornerstone of modern investing, offering a convenient and diversified way to access various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) (Global X FinTech ETF) and [PLAT](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/plat) (WisdomTree Modern Tech Platforms Fund). We'll explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## FINX Vs PLAT: Overview
FINX and PLAT are two distinct ETFs that cater to the rapidly evolving technology sector. While both focus on the tech industry, they take different approaches. FINX is designed to capture the performance of global companies in the financial technology (fintech) sector, whereas PLAT seeks exposure to modern tech platforms across various industries. These differing focuses result in unique investment opportunities and risk profiles.

## FINX Vs PLAT: Sectors and Top Holdings
The FINX ETF is centered around fintech companies, encompassing businesses engaged in payment processing, digital banking, peer-to-peer lending, and more. On the other hand, PLAT ventures into various tech platforms, which may include e-commerce, cloud computing, and social networking. Delving into the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs enables investors to align their portfolios with specific tech-related themes and growth potentials.



![FINX  overlap FINX VS PLAT](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)



## FINX Vs PLAT: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
In terms of asset under management (AUM), both FINX and PLAT have garnered significant attention from investors due to their exposure to promising tech trends. FINX's investment strategy involves selecting global fintech companies that are poised for growth and innovation. PLAT, on the other hand, focuses on tech platforms that connect consumers, businesses, and industries. The varying capitalization and investment strategies lead to different risk-reward dynamics for potential investors.

## FINX Vs PLAT: Tracking Methods and Exposure
The tracking methods employed by FINX and PLAT contribute to their distinct investment profiles. FINX tracks an index of fintech companies using a rules-based approach, aiming to represent the fintech industry's performance. In contrast, PLAT seeks to mirror the performance of tech platforms by following a proprietary index. This difference in tracking methods directly impacts the ETFs' exposures and potential returns.

## Conclusion
FINX and PLAT offer investors valuable opportunities to tap into the transformative power of technology through ETF investments. While FINX concentrates on fintech companies, PLAT widens its scope to encompass a range of modern tech platforms. For those seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more, the ETF Insider app serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly interface, investors can gain comprehensive insights into these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:
.




#### FINX quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) [Global X FinTech ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FINX and PLAT ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

FINX VS PLAT

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have gained immense popularity in the world of finance, offering investors a convenient way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two notable ETFs: [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) (Global X FinTech ETF) and FINQ (The Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF). We'll explore a range of critical aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

## FINX Vs FINQ: Overview
FINX and FINQ are two distinct ETFs, each targeting different sectors within the financial landscape. FINX is focused on the FinTech industry, which encompasses innovative technologies transforming financial services. In contrast, FINQ provides exposure to the net lease real estate market, specifically focusing on properties leased to tenants under long-term, net lease agreements. These divergent investment strategies lead to differing risk profiles and potential returns.

## FINX Vs FINQ: Sectors and Top Holdings
The FINX ETF is designed to capture the growth potential of companies involved in the FinTech sector, such as payment processors, online lenders, and blockchain technology providers. On the other hand, FINQ concentrates on net lease real estate, including properties leased to tenants like retail chains, restaurants, and office spaces. Examining the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking alignment with their investment goals and risk preferences.



![FINX  overlap FINX VS FINQ](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## FINX Vs FINQ: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
In terms of asset under management (AUM), FINX has garnered significant attention due to the rapid evolution of the FinTech industry. Conversely, FINQ's strategy revolves around generating income from long-term net lease agreements, which can provide a stable income stream. The difference in capitalization and investment strategy leads to distinct potential benefits and risks, influencing investors' decision-making processes.

## FINX Vs FINQ: Tracking Methods and Exposure
The FINX ETF tracks an index that includes companies directly engaged in FinTech-related activities, offering exposure to the latest financial innovations. On the other hand, FINQ provides exposure to real estate properties leased to tenants under net lease agreements, aiming to benefit from rental income. Understanding the tracking methods and exposure characteristics is crucial for investors aiming to align their portfolios with specific industry trends.

## Conclusion
FINX and FINQ are two intriguing ETFs, each catering to distinct sectors within the financial realm. Whether an investor is intrigued by the dynamic FinTech industry or seeks the stability of net lease real estate, these ETFs offer unique opportunities. For those keen on gaining deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical details, ETF Insider presents itself as the ultimate tool. With its user-friendly application, it provides a comprehensive overview of these financial instruments, aiding investors in making informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational purposes and does not offer investment advisory services.

Sources:
ETF issuer websites
Financial news outlets
ETF Insider app
Bloomberg Finance L.P.
Morningstar





#### FINX quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) [Global X FinTech ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FINX and FINQ ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

FINX VS FINQ

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) (Global X FinTech ETF) and TPAY (BlockFi Tokenized Payment Rail ETF). We'll delve into the world of ETFs, exploring crucial aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## FINX Vs TPAY: Overview
FINX and TPAY are two ETFs that cater to different corners of the financial industry. While FINX focuses on the rapidly evolving field of financial technology, TPAY offers exposure to the emerging realm of tokenized payment rails. These unique strategies lead to distinct investment opportunities, and we'll navigate through the details in the sections ahead.

## FINX Vs TPAY: Sectors and Top Holdings
The FINX ETF is centered around financial technology companies, encompassing a wide range of businesses such as payment processors, digital banks, and software providers. In contrast, TPAY delves into tokenized payment rails, which involves the integration of blockchain technology in payment systems. By analyzing the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs, investors can gain insights into the industries driving their potential returns.



![FINX  overlap FINX VS TPAY](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## FINX Vs TPAY: Capitalization and Strategy
The FINX ETF boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to fintech disruptors. TPAY, on the other hand, focuses on the innovations introduced by tokenized payment systems. These different strategies not only impact capitalization but also influence potential risks and returns, making it imperative for investors to evaluate their investment objectives.

## FINX Vs TPAY: Tracking and Exposure
FINX aims to mirror the performance of the Solactive FinTech Thematic Index, composed of companies at the forefront of financial technology. TPAY, however, aligns itself with the BlockFi Tokenized Payment Rail Index, providing exposure to blockchain-based payment systems. The methods of tracking and exposure diversify the potential benefits and risks for investors, necessitating a thorough understanding of each ETF's underlying assets.

## Conclusion
In the realm of ETFs, where diverse investment options are abundant, FINX and TPAY stand out as intriguing choices for investors looking to tap into the world of financial innovation. As you navigate through the intricacies of these ETFs, it's important to remember that detailed insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial factors are available through platforms like ETF Insider. This user-friendly app equips investors with the tools needed to make informed decisions in the dynamic landscape of financial markets.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. Investing in ETFs involves risks, and individuals should conduct thorough research and seek professional advice before making investment decisions.

Sources:




#### FINX quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) [Global X FinTech ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FINX and TPAY ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

FINX VS TPAY

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment world, offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two intriguing ETFs: [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) (Global X FinTech ETF) and [LEND](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/lend) (Amplify CrowdBureau Peer-to-Peer Lending &amp; Crowdfunding ETF). We'll explore various facets including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## FINX Vs LEND: Overview
The FINX and LEND ETFs represent two distinct corners of the financial market. FINX focuses on the burgeoning fintech industry, tracking the performance of companies that leverage technology to provide financial services. On the other hand, LEND is dedicated to the peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding space, offering investors exposure to a unique niche within the financial sector. Let's dive deeper into their differences and opportunities.

## FINX Vs LEND: Sectors and Top Holdings
FINX's portfolio includes a variety of fintech subsectors such as digital payments, blockchain technology, and online lending platforms. Top holdings in FINX include companies like Square, PayPal, and Intuit. LEND, in contrast, is centered around peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding platforms like LendingClub and Upstart Holdings. Understanding these sectors and top holdings is crucial for investors aiming to align their portfolios with specific industry trends.


![FINX  overlap FINX VS LEND](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## FINX Vs LEND: Capitalization and Strategy
FINX boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting the increasing interest in fintech innovations. The ETF's strategy revolves around capturing the growth potential of companies transforming traditional financial services through technology. On the other hand, LEND capitalizes on the evolving landscape of peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding, offering investors a unique way to tap into the lending ecosystem. The differing capitalization and strategies present distinct risk and reward profiles for potential investors.

## FINX Vs LEND: Tracking and Exposure
FINX aims to track the performance of a market index composed of global fintech companies, providing investors with exposure to this innovative industry. LEND, however, is designed to capture the performance of companies engaged in peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding activities. The tracking methodologies for these two ETFs are diverse, offering investors distinct avenues for participation in the financial landscape. It's important to understand these tracking mechanisms to make informed investment decisions.

## Conclusion
FINX and LEND are two intriguing ETFs that highlight different aspects of the evolving financial landscape. While FINX focuses on the growth potential of fintech disruptors, LEND delves into the world of peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding. Investors seeking insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable information can turn to ETF Insider, an intuitive and user-friendly app. With this tool, investors can gain in-depth insights into these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:
ETF issuer websites
Financial news sources
ETF prospectuses and fact sheets
Stock exchange data






#### LEND quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [LEND](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/lend) [Amplify CrowdBureau Online Lending and Digital Banking ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/lend), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FINX and LEND ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

FINX VS LEND

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the investment landscape, providing investors with a convenient way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll delve into an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) (Global X FinTech ETF) and [ARKF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/arkf) (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF). We'll explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategies, tracking methods, and exposure.

## FINX Vs ARKF: Overview
FINX and ARKF are both ETFs that focus on the rapidly evolving fintech sector. While they share a common theme, they differ in terms of their investment strategies and underlying assets. FINX aims to track the performance of fintech companies around the world, while ARKF targets companies that are at the forefront of technological innovation within the financial services industry. This distinction leads to variations in portfolio composition and potential risk-reward profiles, which we'll delve into in the subsequent sections.

## FINX Vs ARKF: Sectors and Top Holdings
The FINX ETF casts a wide net across various fintech subsectors, including mobile payments, online lending, and digital banking. Its top holdings might include companies like Square, PayPal, and Adyen. ARKF, on the other hand, hones in on companies involved in disruptive financial technologies such as digital wallets, blockchain, and artificial intelligence. Its holdings could feature names like Square, Zillow, and LendingClub. Understanding the specific sectors and top holdings of each ETF is crucial for investors looking to align their portfolios with the fintech landscape's nuances.


![FINX  overlap FINX VS ARKF](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## FINX Vs ARKF: Capitalization and Investment Strategy
In terms of capitalization and assets under management (AUM), both FINX and ARKF have attracted significant investor interest. However, their investment strategies diverge. FINX aims to replicate the performance of the Solactive Global FinTech Index, while ARKF actively seeks out companies with transformative technologies in the financial industry. The distinction between passive tracking and active selection can influence the potential for returns and volatility associated with each ETF.

## FINX Vs ARKF: Tracking and Exposure
When it comes to tracking methods and exposure, FINX follows the index methodology by holding a diverse range of global fintech companies. ARKF, managed by ARK Invest, employs active management to select companies poised to benefit from technological disruption. This distinction in tracking methods impacts how closely each ETF correlates with its underlying index or investment theme. Investors looking for precise exposure to the fintech sector should consider the tracking mechanisms used by these ETFs.

## Conclusion
FINX and ARKF represent two distinct approaches to investing in the rapidly expanding fintech industry. While FINX offers a broader exposure to various fintech subsectors through passive tracking, ARKF takes an active approach by focusing on companies at the forefront of technological innovation. To gain deeper insights into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial details about these ETFs, consider utilizing tools like ETF insider. This user-friendly app provides investors with valuable insights to help inform their investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:





#### FINX quote and analysis
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the [FINX](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx) [Global X FinTech ETF](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/finx), access _our dedicated page now_.

:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the FINX and ARKF ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

FINX VS ARKF

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a staple in modern investment portfolios, offering exposure to a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: [SMH](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/smh) (VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF) and [WCLD](https://etfinsider.co/analysis-quote/wcld) (WisdomTree Cloud Computing ETF). We'll delve into crucial aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

## SMH Vs WCLD: Overview
SMH and WCLD are two ETFs that cater to different corners of the technology sector. While SMH focuses on the semiconductor industry, WCLD hones in on cloud computing. These distinct focuses lead to unique investment opportunities and risks that we'll explore further in the upcoming sections.

## SMH Vs WCLD: Sectors and Top Holdings
The SMH ETF provides exposure to semiconductor manufacturers, with top holdings like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), NVIDIA, and Intel. On the other hand, WCLD invests in cloud computing companies, including Salesforce, Adobe, and Amazon Web Services. Understanding these sectors and top holdings is vital for investors seeking to align their portfolios with their technology-related investment goals.


![SMH  overlap SMH VS WCLD](/uploads/main_blog_image_0dfaffb561.png)




## SMH Vs WCLD: Capitalization and Strategy
SMH boasts a considerable Asset Under Management (AUM), indicative of its popularity among investors who believe in the growth potential of the semiconductor industry. WCLD's strategy, centered around cloud computing, reflects its anticipation of the ongoing digital transformation. The difference in capitalization and investment strategy plays a role in shaping the potential returns and risks associated with each ETF.

## SMH Vs WCLD: Tracking and Exposure
SMH aims to mirror the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, which consists of companies involved in the production of semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. In contrast, WCLD seeks to track the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, which includes cloud software and service companies. Investors interested in these ETFs must understand their tracking methodologies and exposure to make informed decisions.

## Conclusion
SMH and WCLD offer investors distinct avenues to tap into the technology sector's growth potential. However, delving deeper into the holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other insights requires a reliable resource. Enter ETF Insider, the ultimate tool for exploring and understanding various financial instruments. With its user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive details that aid in making well-informed investment choices.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:




:CallToActionButton{title="Get started" link="https://go.etfinsider.co/bstartnow"}

Compare the SMH and WCLD ETFs with our thorough analysis. Dive into the performance metrics, underlying assets, and investment strategies to see how they stack up against each other. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just getting started, our comparison provides valuable insights to guide your investment decisions.

ETF Comparisons