DGL Vs FKRCX: Sectors and Top Holdings
3 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

DGL Vs FKRCX: Sectors and Top Holdings

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investment, offering diverse exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between two prominent ETFs: DGL (Invesco DB Gold Fund) and FKRCX (Fidelity® Select Gold Portfolio). Our analysis will cover essential aspects including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

DGL Vs FKRCX: Overview

DGL and FKRCX are two distinct ETFs that cater to different investment strategies within the gold sector. While DGL is designed to reflect the performance of gold futures contracts, FKRCX focuses on investing in companies related to the gold industry. This fundamental difference shapes the kind of exposure and risk profile each ETF offers, and we will delve deeper into these aspects in the following sections.

DGL Vs FKRCX: Sectors and Top Holdings

The DGL ETF predominantly concentrates on gold futures contracts as its primary holding. On the other hand, FKRCX invests in shares of companies engaged in various activities related to gold mining and distribution. Exploring the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs aids investors in making informed decisions that align with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

DGL  overlap DGL VS FKRCXDGL overlap DGL VS FKRCX

DGL Vs FKRCX: Capitalization and Strategy

DGL boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), highlighting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the value of gold. In contrast, FKRCX's investment strategy revolves around capitalizing on the performance of gold-related companies. The differences in capitalization and strategy give rise to distinct potential returns and risk profiles that investors need to carefully evaluate.

DGL Vs FKRCX: Tracking and Exposure

DGL's primary objective is to provide investors with exposure to the daily fluctuations in the price of gold through futures contracts. FKRCX, on the other hand, offers exposure to the gold industry through investments in gold mining and distribution companies. The methodologies for tracking and exposure differ significantly; DGL uses futures contracts to closely mirror gold price movements, while FKRCX tracks a selection of gold-related stocks. Understanding these nuances is crucial for investors to select the ETF that aligns with their investment preferences.

Conclusion

DGL and FKRCX are distinct ETFs, each catering to a unique approach to investing in the gold market. For individuals seeking deeper insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other intricate details, ETF Insider stands as an invaluable tool for exploration. With its user-friendly application, ETF Insider empowers investors with comprehensive information on these ETFs and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to offer any investment advisory services.

Sources:

https://etfdb.com/ DGL ETF issuer
https://etfdb.com/etf/DGL/ DGL ETF official page

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is DGL better than FKRCX?

    DGL may be considered better than FKRCX for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does FKRCX beat DGL?

    FKRCX's performance relative to DGL will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in DGL or FKRCX?

    The choice between DGL and FKRCX should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are DGL and FKRCX good investments?

    Both DGL and FKRCX can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between DGL and FKRCX?

    The correlation between DGL and FKRCX can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.