DGL Vs RING: Tracking and Exposure
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

DGL Vs RING: Tracking and Exposure

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, offering a diversified and accessible way to gain exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll embark on an in-depth comparison of two prominent ETFs: DGL (Invesco DB Gold Fund) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF). Our exploration will cover a range of crucial aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

DGL Vs RING: Overview

DGL and RING are two ETFs that offer distinct entry points into the gold market. While DGL is designed to track the performance of gold futures contracts, RING aims to capture the performance of global companies engaged in gold mining. This fundamental difference in focus gives rise to unique risks and opportunities, which we'll dissect in the upcoming sections.

DGL Vs RING: Sectors and Top Holdings

DGL primarily focuses on the physical gold market, with its core holding being gold futures contracts. In contrast, RING invests in the stocks of gold mining companies such as Newmont Corporation, Barrick Gold, and AngloGold Ashanti. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is pivotal in aligning an investor's goals and risk appetite with the right investment choice.

DGL  overlap DGL VS RINGDGL overlap DGL VS RING

DGL Vs RING: Capitalization and Strategy

DGL boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), underscoring its popularity among investors seeking exposure to gold's price movements. On the other hand, RING adopts a strategy centered around the performance of global gold mining companies. This divergence in capitalization and strategy engenders varying potential for returns and risk, necessitating careful consideration from prospective investors.

DGL Vs RING: Tracking and Exposure

The tracking methodologies employed by DGL and RING diverge significantly. DGL achieves its goal of providing exposure to gold futures by tracking a rules-based index, which is designed to reflect changes in the price of gold. In contrast, RING tracks an index composed of global gold mining companies, offering exposure to the mining industry's fortunes. Understanding these tracking mechanisms is essential in making an informed decision based on an investor's objectives.

Conclusion

DGL and RING stand as unique and specialized ETFs, each offering investors an opportunity to gain exposure to the gold market from different angles. For those seeking a comprehensive view of holdings, correlations, overlaps, and various insights, the ETF Insider serves as an invaluable tool. With its user-friendly app, it empowers investors with an abundance of information on these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:

https://www.ishares.com/ RING ETF issuer
https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239654/ishares-msci-global-gold-miners-etf RING ETF official page

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is DGL better than RING?

    DGL may be considered better than RING for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does RING beat DGL?

    RING's performance relative to DGL will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in DGL or RING?

    The choice between DGL and RING should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are DGL and RING good investments?

    Both DGL and RING can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between DGL and RING?

    The correlation between DGL and RING can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.