FHLC VS IHF
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

FHLC VS IHF

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the way investors approach the financial markets, providing them with diversified exposure to various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth analysis and comparison between two prominent ETFs: FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF). We'll explore essential aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, investment strategy, tracking methods, and exposure.

FHLC Vs IHF: Overview

FHLC and IHF are two ETFs with distinct focuses within the healthcare sector. While FHLC seeks to replicate the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, IHF aims to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers industry. These differing objectives result in variations in the underlying holdings and potential returns, which we'll delve into further.

FHLC Vs IHF: Sectors and Top Holdings

The FHLC ETF provides investors with exposure to various sub-sectors within the broader healthcare industry, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and medical equipment. IHF, on the other hand, primarily invests in companies involved in health insurance, diagnostics, and hospital management. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is essential for investors seeking alignment with their investment goals and risk preferences.

FHLC  overlap FHLC VS IHFFHLC overlap FHLC VS IHF

FHLC Vs IHF: Capitalization and Investment Strategy

FHLC boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), signifying its popularity among investors interested in the healthcare sector. The investment strategy of FHLC involves holding a diversified portfolio of healthcare companies, aiming to track the performance of the designated index. IHF's strategy revolves around capturing the performance of U.S. healthcare providers' stocks. The differences in capitalization and investment approach can significantly impact potential returns and risk profiles.

FHLC Vs IHF: Tracking Methods and Exposure

FHLC achieves its investment objective by replicating the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, which consists of a broad range of healthcare companies. IHF tracks an index composed of healthcare providers, including health insurers, diagnostics companies, and hospitals. The contrasting tracking methods and exposures of these ETFs offer investors unique opportunities to align their portfolios with specific sub-sectors within the healthcare industry.

Conclusion

In summary, FHLC and IHF represent two distinct ways to gain exposure to the healthcare sector within the ETF landscape. While FHLC provides diversified exposure to various healthcare sub-sectors, IHF focuses on the performance of U.S. healthcare providers' equities. To gain a deeper understanding of these ETFs, their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other valuable insights, investors can leverage tools like ETF Insider. This user-friendly app offers comprehensive information about these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. Before making any investment decisions, readers should conduct thorough research and consult with a qualified financial professional.

Sources:
Fidelity Investments. (n.d.). FHLC: Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF Overview. Retrieved from https://www.fidelity.com
iShares by BlackRock. (n.d.). IHF: iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF Overview. Retrieved from https://www.ishares.com

IHF quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is FHLC better than IHF?

    FHLC may be considered better than IHF for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does IHF beat FHLC?

    IHF's performance relative to FHLC will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in FHLC or IHF?

    The choice between FHLC and IHF should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are FHLC and IHF good investments?

    Both FHLC and IHF can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between FHLC and IHF?

    The correlation between FHLC and IHF can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.