GLDM VS GLTR
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GLDM VS GLTR

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of modern investing, offering a diverse range of exposures across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct a thorough comparison between two prominent ETFs: GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares). We will delve into essential aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

GLDM Vs GLTR: Overview

GLDM and GLTR are two ETFs that approach precious metals investing in distinctive ways. GLDM, as the name suggests, focuses on tracking the price of gold. On the other hand, GLTR offers exposure to a broader array of precious metals, including gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. This divergence in focus leads to varying risk profiles and potential returns, aspects we will explore in the following sections.

GLDM Vs GLTR: Sectors and Top Holdings

The GLDM ETF is dedicated solely to gold and holds physical gold bars in its portfolio. In contrast, GLTR diversifies across multiple precious metals, allocating its assets in a basket of physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. Understanding the sectors and top holdings is vital for investors seeking alignment with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

GLDM  overlap GLDM VS GLTRGLDM overlap GLDM VS GLTR

GLDM Vs GLTR: Capitalization and Strategy

GLDM boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), underscoring its popularity among investors seeking a direct play on the price of gold. GLTR's strategy revolves around providing exposure to a range of precious metals, potentially offering a hedge against various economic conditions. The difference in capitalization and strategy between the two ETFs introduces distinct opportunities and risks, demanding careful consideration.

GLDM Vs GLTR: Tracking and Exposure

The primary objective of GLDM is to mirror the daily price movement of gold, offering investors a way to participate in gold's value fluctuations. In contrast, GLTR provides broader exposure by tracking a precious metals index that includes gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. The tracking mechanisms differ significantly: GLDM's price movement closely mirrors gold's price, while GLTR's performance is influenced by a mix of precious metals prices. Grasping the nuances of tracking and exposure methods is crucial for selecting the ETF that aligns with one's investment goals.

Conclusion

GLDM and GLTR exemplify diverse approaches to investing in precious metals, each catering to distinct investment preferences. For those desiring a comprehensive insight into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other crucial insights, ETF Insider emerges as the ultimate tool. Through a user-friendly app, it furnishes extensive information about these financial instruments, aiding investors in making informed decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not offer investment advisory services.

Sources:

GLTR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is GLDM better than GLTR?

    GLDM may be considered better than GLTR for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does GLTR beat GLDM?

    GLTR's performance relative to GLDM will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in GLDM or GLTR?

    The choice between GLDM and GLTR should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are GLDM and GLTR good investments?

    Both GLDM and GLTR can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between GLDM and GLTR?

    The correlation between GLDM and GLTR can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.