GLTR VS BAR
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

GLTR VS BAR

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, allowing individuals to gain exposure to various sectors and assets. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two noteworthy precious metal ETFs: GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust). Through an examination of ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure, we'll uncover the unique features of these two investment options.

GLTR VS BAR: Overview

GLTR and BAR are both precious metal ETFs, but they offer distinct strategies when it comes to investing in precious metals. GLTR provides exposure to a diversified basket of precious metals, including gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. On the other hand, BAR focuses solely on gold as its underlying asset. Let's delve deeper into the differences between these ETFs.

GLTR VS BAR: Sectors and Top Holdings

GLTR's approach to precious metals investing encompasses a broader spectrum, which includes silver, platinum, and palladium alongside gold. This diversified composition helps spread the risks associated with individual metals. BAR, as a single-metal ETF, concentrates exclusively on gold. Understanding the composition of these ETFs' portfolios can aid investors in selecting the one that aligns with their investment objectives.

GLTR overlap GLTR VS BARGLTR overlap GLTR VS BAR

GLTR VS BAR: Capitalization and Strategy

The capitalization and strategy of GLTR and BAR reflect their distinct investment approaches. GLTR's diverse basket strategy is backed by a substantial asset under management (AUM), indicating its popularity among investors who seek exposure to multiple precious metals. BAR, with its focus on gold, seeks to track the performance of the gold price. The contrast in capitalization and strategy presents investors with choices tailored to their risk appetites and investment preferences.

GLTR VS BAR: Tracking and Exposure

GLTR's objective is to replicate the performance of a specific index that includes a basket of precious metals. This approach provides investors with exposure to the collective price movements of gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. In contrast, BAR's tracking strategy aims to mimic the performance of gold prices specifically. The choice between diversified exposure and concentrated gold exposure depends on an investor's outlook and portfolio diversification strategy.

Conclusion

GLTR and BAR offer investors distinct opportunities in the realm of precious metals investing. While GLTR provides a diversified approach by including multiple precious metals in its portfolio, BAR hones in on the allure of gold. For investors who wish to gain insights into holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more, ETF Insider is a valuable tool to consider. With its user-friendly app, investors can access comprehensive details on these and other financial instruments, aiding in informed investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Sources:

Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) official website
GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) official website

GLTR ETF issuer
GLTR ETF official page

GLTR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started