LQD VS MUB
3 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

LQD VS MUB

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the landscape of investing, offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and MUB (iShares National Muni Bond ETF). We will explore key aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

LQD Vs MUB: Overview

LQD and MUB are two distinct ETFs that cater to different segments within the fixed-income market. LQD focuses on investment-grade corporate bonds, while MUB is centered around municipal bonds issued by state and local governments. This divergence in focus translates to varying risk profiles and income potential, which we will dissect in the subsequent sections.

LQD Vs MUB: Sectors and Top Holdings

The LQD ETF primarily invests in a diversified portfolio of investment-grade corporate bonds issued by well-established companies. On the other hand, MUB is geared towards municipal bonds, which fund various public infrastructure projects. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors seeking steady income while managing risk based on the underlying securities.

LQD  overlap LQD VS MUBLQD overlap LQD VS MUB

LQD Vs MUB: Capitalization and Strategy

LQD boasts a substantial asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the relatively stable corporate bond market. MUB's strategy revolves around providing income that is generally exempt from federal income taxes. The differences in capitalization and strategy between these two ETFs lead to distinctive risk-return profiles, requiring investors to make informed decisions based on their financial objectives.

LQD Vs MUB: Tracking and Exposure

LQD aims to provide investors with exposure to a diversified portfolio of investment-grade corporate bonds, seeking to replicate the performance of the underlying index. MUB, on the other hand, seeks to mirror the performance of an index composed of investment-grade municipal bonds issued within the United States. Investors seeking income through bond ETFs can choose between corporate and municipal bonds based on their risk appetite and tax considerations.

Conclusion

LQD and MUB stand as unique ETFs, each catering to different aspects of the fixed-income market. For investors interested in gaining insights into the intricacies of these ETFs, such as their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other relevant information, ETF Insider is a valuable tool to explore. With its user-friendly app, it offers in-depth details on these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide investment advisory services.

Sources:

LQD quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is LQD better than MUB?

    LQD may be considered better than MUB for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does MUB beat LQD?

    MUB's performance relative to LQD will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in LQD or MUB?

    The choice between LQD and MUB should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are LQD and MUB good investments?

    Both LQD and MUB can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between LQD and MUB?

    The correlation between LQD and MUB can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.