MOMO VS PDP
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

MOMO VS PDP

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have become a popular choice for investors looking to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to specific sectors and assets. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: MOMO (MomentumShares US Quantitative Momentum ETF) and PDP (Invesco DWA Momentum ETF). We will delve into various aspects, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

MOMO VS PDP: Overview

MOMO and PDP are two ETFs that share a focus on momentum investing, but they differ in their approach. MOMO seeks to capture the momentum factor within the U.S. equity market by selecting stocks with strong momentum characteristics, while PDP relies on the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index to identify leading companies in the market. This distinction in investment strategies leads to variations in their performance and risk profiles.

MOMO VS PDP: Sectors and Top Holdings

When it comes to sectors, MOMO's portfolio primarily consists of stocks from various sectors, with a concentration in technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary. On the other hand, PDP's selection is determined by the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, which emphasizes sectors showing strong relative strength. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs can aid investors in aligning their investments with specific sector preferences and risk appetites.

MOMO overlap MOMO VS PDPMOMO overlap MOMO VS PDP

MOMO VS PDP: Capitalization and Strategy

MOMO boasts a substantial Asset Under Management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking momentum exposure. Its strategy relies on quantitative analysis to identify stocks with strong price momentum, making it suitable for investors who believe in the persistence of trends. PDP, on the other hand, follows an index-based approach, focusing on the performance of companies exhibiting relative strength. The differences in capitalization and investment strategy result in varying potential returns and risks, which investors must carefully consider.

MOMO VS PDP: Tracking and Exposure

MOMO aims to provide investors with exposure to stocks with strong momentum characteristics. It achieves this by actively selecting stocks based on quantitative models. PDP, on the other hand, tracks the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, which consists of companies demonstrating technical strength. These distinct tracking and exposure strategies can impact how these ETFs perform during different market conditions and should guide investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their investment objectives.

Conclusion

MOMO and PDP are two notable ETFs, both offering a unique approach to capturing momentum in the equity market. To gain deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and other critical information, consider utilizing ETF insider, an user-friendly app that provides comprehensive details on these and other financial instruments.

Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.

Get started