PHYS VS GLTR

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment landscape, offering a versatile way to gain exposure to diverse sectors and asset classes. In this article, we'll delve into a comprehensive comparison between two prominent ETFs: PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares). We'll explore various facets, including ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

PHYS Vs GLTR: Overview

PHYS and GLTR are two ETFs that cater to investors seeking exposure to precious metals, specifically gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. PHYS provides direct ownership of physical gold, while GLTR offers a diversified basket of physical precious metals. These distinct approaches provide different risk-return profiles and are particularly relevant in times of economic uncertainty.

PHYS Vs GLTR: Sectors and Top Holdings

The PHYS ETF is primarily focused on gold, and its top holding consists of allocated gold bars stored in secure vaults. In contrast, GLTR offers a mix of four precious metals: gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. The sectors and top holdings of these ETFs reflect the unique attributes of each metal and their potential roles in an investor's portfolio.
PHYS overlap PHYS VS GLTR

PHYS Vs GLTR: Capitalization and Strategy

PHYS holds a significant amount of gold, contributing to its substantial Asset Under Management (AUM). The fund's strategy revolves around offering investors a direct ownership stake in physical gold, providing a hedge against inflation and currency fluctuations. GLTR's strategy encompasses a diversified basket of precious metals, providing exposure to multiple metals' price movements, which can mitigate risks associated with individual metal volatility.

PHYS Vs GLTR: Tracking and Exposure

PHYS is designed to track the price of physical gold, providing investors with exposure to gold's market value movements. On the other hand, GLTR seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index representing a basket of four precious metals. This difference in tracking methods results in varying sensitivities to changes in individual metal prices, making GLTR suitable for investors looking for broader exposure to precious metals.

Conclusion

PHYS and GLTR represent two distinct approaches to investing in precious metals. While PHYS offers a direct ownership stake in physical gold, GLTR provides diversification across a basket of precious metals, including gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. Both ETFs have their own merits and considerations, depending on an investor's objectives and risk tolerance.

For those interested in gaining deeper insights into ETFs like PHYS and GLTR, as well as other financial instruments, ETF Insider offers a user-friendly app that provides valuable information on holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more. This tool can assist investors in making informed decisions based on thorough analysis and understanding.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not provide investment advisory services. It's crucial for investors to conduct thorough research and consider their financial goals and risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.

Sources:

GLTR quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.

Get started