ROBO VS XLK
4 min read
By Ron Koren, ETF Insider

ROBO VS XLK

In the world of finance, ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) have become a popular investment vehicle for many investors. Two of the most discussed ETFs in the tech and robotics sectors are ROBO and XLK. But how do they stack up against each other? In this article, we'll dive deep into the comparison of ROBO vs XLK, exploring their sectors, top holdings, capitalization strategies, and tracking exposure.

ROBO VS XLK: Sectors and Top Holdings

ROBO, as the name suggests, focuses primarily on the robotics and automation sector. This ETF provides exposure to companies that are at the forefront of robotics innovation, from manufacturing robots to AI-driven automation solutions. Some of its top holdings include companies like Intuitive Surgical, ABB, and Teradyne.
On the other hand, XLK is more of a broad tech ETF. It encompasses a wider range of technology sectors, from software and services to hardware and semiconductors. Its top holdings are some of the biggest names in the tech industry, including Apple, Microsoft, and Visa.

ROBO overlap ROBO VS XLKROBO overlap ROBO VS XLK

ROBO VS XLK: Capitalization Strategy

When it comes to capitalization strategy, ROBO and XLK differ significantly. ROBO adopts an equal-weighted approach, meaning it allocates roughly the same amount of capital to each holding. This strategy ensures that no single company dominates the ETF, allowing for a more diversified exposure to the robotics and automation sector.
XLK, in contrast, uses a market capitalization-weighted approach. This means that the amount of capital allocated to each holding is proportional to its market cap. As a result, larger tech companies like Apple and Microsoft have a more significant influence on the ETF's performance.

ROBO VS XLK: Tracking and Exposure

Both ROBO and XLK aim to track their respective indices closely. ROBO tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, which is designed to measure the performance of robotics-related companies. This ensures that investors get a pure-play exposure to the robotics and automation sector.
XLK, meanwhile, tracks the Technology Select Sector Index. This index offers exposure to the broader technology sector, encompassing everything from software and services to telecommunications. As such, investors in XLK get a more diversified exposure to the tech industry.

Conclusion

Choosing between ROBO and XLK largely depends on an investor's goals and risk tolerance. If you're looking for a more niche exposure to the rapidly growing robotics and automation sector, ROBO might be the better choice. However, if you prefer a broader exposure to the tech industry, with a mix of both established giants and emerging players, XLK could be more suitable.
Both ETFs offer unique opportunities and risks. As always, it's essential to do thorough research and possibly consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Sources

  1. ROBO Global. "ROBO ETF Overview." ROBO Global, 2023.
  2. SPDR. "Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund." SPDR, 2023.
  3. ETF Database. "ROBO vs. XLK: Head-to-Head ETF Comparison." ETFdb.com, 2023.

ROBO ETF issuer
ROBO ETF official page

XLK quote and analysis

Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund, access our dedicated page now.

Get started