Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have revolutionized the investment world, offering diversified exposure across various sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two popular ETFs: SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF). We'll examine various aspects including the ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.
SGDJ and GLTR are two ETFs that provide distinct exposure within the precious metals industry. While SGDJ focuses on junior gold mining companies, GLTR offers a unique approach by holding physical precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. This fundamental difference in strategy leads to varying risk profiles and potential returns, which we will explore further in the following sections.
The SGDJ ETF primarily invests in junior gold mining companies, which are smaller and less established than their larger counterparts. These companies are involved in the exploration, development, and production of gold. On the other hand, GLTR is invested in a diversified basket of physical precious metals. It holds a mix of gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, providing investors with exposure to a broader range of metals within the precious metals sector.
SGDJ overlap SGDJ VS GLTR
SGDJ's focus on junior gold miners is reflected in its smaller asset under management (AUM) compared to GLTR. Junior miners are generally associated with higher volatility and potential for growth. In contrast, GLTR's strategy revolves around holding physical precious metals, aiming to track the prices of these metals over time. The difference in capitalization and strategy between the two ETFs can significantly impact their performance under various market conditions.
SGDJ's tracking is tied to the performance of junior gold mining companies, which can be influenced by factors such as exploration success, production efficiency, and gold prices. GLTR, however, tracks the physical prices of gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. This approach provides a direct link to the market prices of these precious metals, making GLTR a potential hedge against inflation and currency fluctuations. Investors seeking exposure to specific precious metals might find GLTR's strategy appealing.
SGDJ and GLTR are distinct ETFs that cater to different investment preferences within the precious metals sector. Whether you are interested in the growth potential of junior gold mining companies or the stability of physical precious metals, these ETFs offer unique opportunities. If you're looking to gain deeper insights into their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and more, consider using ETF Insider—an user-friendly app designed to provide comprehensive information about various financial instruments.
Disclaimer: This article does not provide any investment advisory services.
Sources:
Discover the top holdings, correlations, and overlaps of ETFs using our visualization tool.
Our app allows you to build and track your portfolio.
To learn more about the GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF, access our dedicated page now.
SGDJ may be considered better than GLTR for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.
GLTR's performance relative to SGDJ will vary over time, depending on market conditions.
The choice between SGDJ and GLTR should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.
Both SGDJ and GLTR can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.
The correlation between SGDJ and GLTR can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.