UUP VS FXA
4 min read
By Beqa Bumbeishvili, ETF Insider

UUP VS FXA

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have transformed the way investors approach financial markets, providing them with diversified exposure across a wide range of sectors and asset classes. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison of two prominent ETFs: UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) and FXA (Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust). This analysis will delve into various critical aspects such as ETF tickers, full names, issuers, sectors, top holdings, capitalization, strategy, tracking, and exposure.

UUP Vs FXA: Overview

UUP and FXA are two ETFs that represent distinct investment strategies related to currency markets. While UUP aims to track the performance of the US Dollar Index, FXA focuses on the Australian Dollar. This fundamental difference in focus leads to varying degrees of exposure and risk, which we will explore in the upcoming sections.

UUP Vs FXA: Sectors and Top Holdings

The UUP ETF primarily concentrates on the US Dollar, with holdings that include US Treasury futures contracts. In contrast, FXA is designed to mirror the performance of the Australian Dollar and holds Australian Dollar-denominated deposits. Understanding the sectors and top holdings of these ETFs is crucial for investors to align their choices with their investment objectives and risk appetite.

UUP  overlap UUP VS FXAUUP overlap UUP VS FXA

UUP Vs FXA: Capitalization and Strategy

UUP has a considerable asset under management (AUM), reflecting its popularity among investors seeking exposure to the movements of the US Dollar. On the other hand, FXA's strategy is centered around tracking the Australian Dollar's performance against the US Dollar. The difference in capitalization and strategy between these two ETFs introduces distinct potentials for returns and risks, necessitating careful consideration from investors.

UUP Vs FXA: Tracking and Exposure

UUP's primary objective is to provide investors with exposure to the fluctuations in the US Dollar's value relative to a basket of major world currencies. In contrast, FXA is focused on offering exposure to the Australian Dollar's value against the US Dollar. UUP tracks the US Dollar Index through futures contracts, while FXA holds Australian Dollar-denominated deposits. Understanding the different tracking mechanisms and exposure strategies assists investors in selecting the ETF that aligns with their financial goals.

Conclusion

UUP and FXA are distinct ETFs that cater to investors seeking specific exposure to currency movements, particularly related to the US Dollar and the Australian Dollar. For those interested in delving deeper into the intricacies of these ETFs, such as their holdings, correlations, overlaps, and valuable insights, ETF Insider serves as the ultimate tool. This user-friendly app provides comprehensive details about these financial instruments and more.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational purposes and does not offer any form of investment advisory services.

Sources:

Get started

FAQ

  • Why is UUP better than FXA?

    UUP may be considered better than FXA for some investors due to its specific focus, offering diversification.

  • Does FXA beat UUP?

    FXA's performance relative to UUP will vary over time, depending on market conditions.

  • Should I invest in UUP or FXA?

    The choice between UUP and FXA should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and desired exposure.

  • Are UUP and FXA good investments?

    Both UUP and FXA can be suitable investments depending on individual investment strategies, goals, and risk profiles.

  • What is the correlation between UUP and FXA?

    The correlation between UUP and FXA can vary over time, reflecting differences in performance.